We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Phytotoxic impacts of microplastic pollution on cellular redox homeostasis and antioxidant defences in plants: a multilevel meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This analysis combined data from existing plant studies and found that microplastic exposure raised markers of cell damage, including hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde, while also triggering increases in protective enzymes like SOD, CAT and POD. A biodegradable plastic type showed stronger enzyme responses in some measures, but evidence was limited, leaving unclear whether biodegradable plastics are more or less harmful to plants than conventional ones.
Abstract The rapid build-up of plastic pollution in land-based ecosystems is a serious abiotic stressor that directly threatens cellular redox balance in plants. To precisely evaluate the risk of oxidative stress associated with microplastic exposure, a meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA protocol, using a multilevel random-effects model. By combining extensive literature data, this analysis examined biomarkers such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ). The meta-analysis showed that microplastic exposure caused significant oxidative damage in plants, indicated by profound increases in reactive oxygen species, especially H 2 O 2 ( g = 3.60, 95% CI: 2.34–4.86, p < 0.001), and in lipid peroxidation, as indicated by MDA ( g = 3.58, 95% CI: 2.95–4.21, p < 0.001). In response to this cellular injury, plants displayed a statistically significant, compensatory upregulation in their enzymatic defence systems (CAT: g = 3.02, 95% CI: 2.43–3.62; SOD: g = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.81–2.49; POD: g = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.05–1.95; all p < 0.001). Additionally, moderator analyses found that Plastic Type was a crucial factor influencing these enzymatic responses. Exploratory subgroup analyses tentatively suggested that PBAT, a biodegradable polymer, was associated with stronger SOD and CAT responses than conventional microplastics; however, these subgroup estimates are based on a small number of effect sizes ( k = 4–9), were not consistent across all biomarkers (e.g., POD and H₂O₂ showed no such pattern), and should therefore be regarded as preliminary and requiring confirmation. In summary, these results provide no indication that the biodegradable polymers examined here are less phytotoxic than conventional ones; however, the small number of biodegradable-polymer comparisons means that neither a safety advantage nor a disadvantage can be established from the present evidence, and polymer-related phytotoxic risk remains an open question for agricultural sustainability.
More Papers Like This
The multifaceted mechanisms of microplastic inhibition of tomato plant growth: oxidative toxicity, metabolic perturbation, and photosynthetic damage
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed tomato seedlings to biodegradable and conventional microplastics and investigated photosynthetic performance, metabolic disruption, and oxidative stress responses. Both microplastic types inhibited tomato growth and caused oxidative damage, with impacts on the photosynthetic apparatus and metabolite profiles, challenging the assumption that biodegradable plastics are safer for agricultural systems.
Meta-analysis reveals the combined effects of microplastics and heavy metal on plants
AI summary Read the abstract
A meta-analysis of 57 studies found that the combined toxicity of microplastics and heavy metals on plants is driven primarily by the heavy metals, while microplastics mainly interact by inducing oxidative stress damage. Microplastic biodegradation emerged as a core factor influencing heavy metal accumulation in plants, with culture environment, heavy metal type, exposure duration, and microplastic concentration and size all playing roles.
Effect of Non-biodegradable and Biodegradable Microplastics on Plants from Physiological to individual levels: A Meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis pools data from 180 studies to compare how biodegradable and non-biodegradable microplastics affect plant health. It found that both types can harm plant growth and physiology, which matters because contaminated crops could eventually transfer microplastics into the food supply that humans depend on.
Bioavailability and phytotoxicity of micro/nanoplastics to aquatic plants: Trends, environmental drivers and mechanisms
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis found that micro- and nanoplastics cause significant harm to aquatic plants, reducing their biomass and chlorophyll content through oxidative stress. Polyethylene was especially damaging, cutting plant biomass by over 42%. When plastic pollution harms the base of aquatic food chains, the effects can ripple upward through ecosystems that support both wildlife and human food sources.
Toxic effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on plants: A global meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis of 101 studies found that micro- and nanoplastics negatively affect plant physiology, with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) showing the strongest impact on fresh weight, chlorophyll, and reactive oxygen species. Microplastics inhibited most growth and photosynthetic indicators more strongly than nanoplastics, and exposure consistently triggered increased biochemical stress enzyme activity.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.