We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Bioavailability and phytotoxicity of micro/nanoplastics to aquatic plants: Trends, environmental drivers and mechanisms
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis found that micro- and nanoplastics cause significant harm to aquatic plants, reducing their biomass and chlorophyll content through oxidative stress. Polyethylene was especially damaging, cutting plant biomass by over 42%. When plastic pollution harms the base of aquatic food chains, the effects can ripple upward through ecosystems that support both wildlife and human food sources.
• M/NPs can be internalized by aquatic plants via leaves and roots. • Temperature, pH, ionic strength , and DOM affect M/NPs aggregation and bioavailability. • M/NPs induce oxidative stress , inhibiting aquatic plant growth. • M/NPs cause phytotoxicity via physical damage, disrupting photosynthesis , genetics, metabolism. Inadequate handling and spread of micro/nanoplastics (M/NPs) have led to a surge in their distribution and accumulation in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. As aquatic ecosystems are a major sink for M/NPs, it is vital to comprehend their environmental behavior and biological effects. Currently, there has been increasing concerns and investigations on the potential effects of M/NPs on aquatic plants, but the general trends, driving factors and action mechanisms of M/NPs on aquatic plants have not been synthesized yet. Herein, we review research trends, the pathway of adsorption, uptake, transport, and accumulation of M/NPs by aquatic plants, as well as the major environmental factors affecting their behavior and bioavailability. Furthermore, the meta-analysis results demonstrated that M/NPs induced significant oxidative stress , with a 52.9% increase in H 2 O 2 , leading to a reduction in plant total biomass (7.2%) and chlorophyll content (17.8%). This inhibitory effect was particularly dependent on the type of M/NPs. Specifically, polyethylene plastic reduced total biomass by 42.38%, which was much higher than that by polyvinylchloride (14.28%). Moreover, the toxicity mechanism of M/NPs on aquatic plants are addressed. Lastly, future perspectives are proposed. This review would provide guidance on assessing the environmental risk and ecotoxicity of M/NPs to dominant primary producers in aquatic ecosystems.
More Papers Like This
Effect of plastic pollution on freshwater flora: A meta-analysis approach to elucidate the factors influencing plant growth and biochemical markers
AI summary Read the abstract
Meta-analysis of 43 studies found that higher concentrations of micro- and nanoplastics negatively affected aquatic plant growth while increasing protein content and antioxidant enzyme activity as a stress response. Among polymers, PVC most strongly disrupted photosynthetic pigments, and algal species were the most growth-sensitive plant group.
Impact of microplastics on plant physiology: A meta-analysis of dose, particle size, and crop type interactions in agricultural ecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis of 37 studies found that microplastics significantly decrease plant biomass by 13% and chlorophyll content by 28%, while increasing oxidative stress by 20%. Higher doses and smaller particle sizes caused more damage, with particle size having a greater impact than concentration — and root activity was particularly sensitive to microplastic exposure.
Microplastic pollution disrupts microalgal physiology globally: a meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
A large analysis of 67 studies found that microplastics harm the tiny algae that form the base of freshwater food chains, stunting their growth, reducing their numbers, and impairing photosynthesis, with the smallest "nanoplastic" particles causing the most damage. Since these algae produce oxygen and support the entire aquatic food web (including fish we eat), widespread plastic pollution could ripple upward, potentially affecting water quality and food supplies that humans depend on.
Toxic effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on plants: A global meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis of 101 studies found that micro- and nanoplastics negatively affect plant physiology, with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) showing the strongest impact on fresh weight, chlorophyll, and reactive oxygen species. Microplastics inhibited most growth and photosynthetic indicators more strongly than nanoplastics, and exposure consistently triggered increased biochemical stress enzyme activity.
Adsorption, uptake and toxicity of micro- and nanoplastics: Effects on terrestrial plants and aquatic macrophytes
AI summary Read the abstract
This review summarizes research on how micro- and nanoplastics interact with terrestrial plants and aquatic macrophytes, finding that many species can absorb or take up plastic particles. Both short-term and long-term plastic exposure triggered stress responses in plants, and since plants are at the base of food chains and a major part of the human diet, there is concern about plastics moving up through the food web. The findings suggest that plastic pollution could potentially affect plant productivity and broader ecosystem function.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.