0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Postbiotic sequestration of micro- and nanoplastics: in vitro intestinal epithelial protection and proof of concept in the human mouth

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists tested a heat-treated probiotic ingredient called Qi601 and found it can grab onto tiny plastic particles, reducing how much sticks to or enters gut cells in lab tests. A small human chewing-gum experiment showed similar plastic-trapping in saliva. This early research suggests a possible future way to lower our plastic exposure from food, but larger studies are still needed to confirm it works in the body.

Polymers
Body Systems
Study Type In vivo

Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) are ubiquitous dietary contaminants, yet practical strategies to reduce gastrointestinal exposure remain limited. We evaluated whether Qi601, a heat-inactivated Limosilactobacillus fermentum biofilm-derived postbiotic, could sequester fluorescent 100-nm polystyrene nanoplastics (PSNPs) and reduce their interaction with Caco-2 intestinal epithelial monolayers using sequential simulated digestion, protection, post-exposure rescue, and transfer assays. Consistent with particle sequestration, Qi601 produced approximately 92% depletion of free PSNP-associated fluorescence from the supernatant during sequential digestion. In protection assays, Qi601 reduced surface-associated and intracellular PSNP fluorescence by 65% and 67%, respectively, at 5 h, and by 41% and 33% at 24 h. In monolayers previously exposed to PSNPs for 24 h, Qi601 reduced surface-associated and intracellular PSNP fluorescence by 77% and 43%, respectively. Transfer of PSNP fluorescence from Qi601–PSNP agglomerates to Caco-2 cells remained ≤ 0.057%. Atomic force, scanning electron, and confocal microscopy demonstrated close physical association between Qi601 and PSNPs with predominantly extracellular localization of Qi601-associated PSNPs. In a qualitative human proof-of-concept chewing-gum experiment, microscopy of saliva showed heterogeneous, Nile Red-positive polymers within or closely associated with Qi601 agglomerates. Laser direct infrared (LDIR) chemical imaging showed that the number of rubber-class particles from the gum-plus-Qi601 saliva sample was 43% lower than from the gum-only sample (2,562 versus 4,529 particles; hit quality index ≥ 0.70); after procedural-control subtraction, the background-adjusted rubber particle count was approximately 91% lower (185 versus 2,152 particles; hit quality index ≥ 0.70). These findings establish proof of concept for postbiotic-mediated sequestration of dietary MNPs and support a model in which Qi601 limits their epithelial association and intracellular burden. To our knowledge, this represents the first human in vivo proof-of-concept study directly demonstrating physical association between an administered intervention designed to capture microplastics and microplastic particles. Further studies should define the molecular basis of Qi601–MNP interactions, characterize their gastrointestinal fate, and validate these findings in larger studies.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Postbiotic Binding of Micro- and Nanoplastics: In Vitro Intestinal Epithelial Protection and Proof of Concept in the Human Mouth

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists tested a heat-treated bacterial ingredient (a "postbiotic" called Qi601) to see if it could grab onto tiny plastic particles and keep them from getting absorbed by gut cells — and in lab tests, it worked, reducing how much plastic stuck to or entered intestinal cells. In an early human test, chewing gum containing this ingredient even captured plastic fragments released while chewing, suggesting a possible future strategy to lower our daily exposure to micro- and nanoplastics from food and other sources. That said, this is early-stage research done in cells and one small human mouth experiment, so more

Article Tier 2

Novel probiotics adsorbing and excreting microplastics in vivo show potential gut health benefits

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers screened 784 bacterial strains for the ability to bind polystyrene particles in the lab and selected two, L. paracasei DT66 and L. plantarum DT88. Mice given the strains passed 34% more polystyrene in feces and had 67% less left in the intestine. DT88 also lowered intestinal inflammation in the mice.

Article Tier 2

The microplastic-crisis: Role of bacteria in fighting microplastic-effects in the digestive system

AI summary Read the abstract

This review describes how micro- and nanoplastics may affect the digestive tract, including the gut microbiota, digestive enzymes and the mucus layer. The authors compared probiotic genomes with known plastic degraders and found no probiotic able to degrade plastic. They discuss probiotics instead for effects on microbial diversity, the gut barrier and inflammation.

Article Tier 2

Biodegradation of microplastic by probiotic bifidobacterium

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis can biodegrade microplastics, demonstrating a novel microbial approach to addressing plastic pollution using a gut-resident bacterium known for regulating intestinal microbiota.

Article Tier 2

Determination of the ability of native potential probiotic lactobacillus strains in nanoplastic bioremoval in an in-vitro Model

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested 88 native probiotic Lactobacillus strains for their ability to bind and remove polystyrene nanoplastics in laboratory conditions, finding that a cocktail of three strains achieved up to 77% removal. The most effective strain, L. plantarum RP13, showed strong nanoplastic adhesion confirmed by microscopy imaging. The study suggests that certain probiotic bacteria may have potential as a biological approach to reducing nanoplastic exposure in the gastrointestinal tract.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper