We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Occurrence and ecological risks of microplastics and bisphenol A in a coastal receiving environment affected by wastewater from a large-scale plastic production enterprise
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that wastewater from a large plastic factory dramatically increased microplastic pollution downstream, up to 5 times more than upstream areas, and these plastic particles carried concerning levels of bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical linked to hormone disruption. The contamination levels were high enough to pose serious risks to fish and other wildlife in the affected waterways and bay, which matters because these are the same waters that support seafood humans eat and coastal ecosystems people rely on.
Plastic production enterprises are significant sources of microplastics (MPs) and bisphenol A (BPA), but the environmental impacts of their wastewater remain unclear. This study investigated the receiving environment of a large-scale plastic production enterprise whose wastewater discharges into a coastal inflow river and ultimately flows into the bay. MP concentrations in downstream river water and sediments ranged from 1001 to 2514 items/L and 3055-6355 items/kg, respectively, increasing by 413.21% and 380.69% compared with upstream areas. In the outlet effluent, polyethylene was dominant (35.75%), followed by polypropylene (25.12%) and polyethylene terephthalate (21.65%). Polyethylene terephthalate tended to deposit in sediments, while PE migrated over long distances and dominated downstream river and bay samples. The molecular weight of MPs showed an increase of 10.19%-28.29% in downstream areas, which suggests the input of less-aged MPs from the plastic production enterprise. As BPA carriers, MPs contained BPA at concentrations 2-12 times higher than background concentration, and BPA release during MP fragmentation may pose a potential threat. To evaluate ecological risks, toxicity data for MPs in freshwater, seawater, freshwater sediment, and marine sediment were compiled separately, and species sensitivity distribution and risk quotient (RQ) methods were applied to each compartment. For MPs, RQ values were 10.52-119.71 in freshwater, 4.70-17.38 in seawater, 0.45-4.64 in freshwater sediment, and 5.57-19.13 in marine sediment, indicating generally high ecological risk. Overall, plastic industry effluent greatly modified pollutant composition, transport behavior, and ecological risks across the coastal environment.
More Papers Like This
Sediment dispersal of PE and PVC primary microplastics in a coastal archipelago surrounding a plastic production industrial complex
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists studied the seafloor near a plastics factory and found tiny plastic particles (called microplastics) scattered across nearby coastal sediments, showing that plastic pollution spreads well beyond where it's made. This matters because these particles can enter the food chain, including seafood we eat, and while research on health effects is still developing, reducing this kind of pollution at the source could help limit our long-term exposure.
Petrochemical industry as a source for microplastics; abundance and characteristics of pollution in soil, sewage, and bay
AI summary Read the abstract
This is the first study to track microplastic pollution from a petrochemical industrial site through its soil, wastewater, and into the nearby bay. Soil near the production facilities contained up to 4,620 microplastic particles per kilogram, and significant amounts passed through wastewater treatment into open waters. The research shows that plastic manufacturing facilities are a direct and substantial source of microplastic contamination in the environment.
Pollution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Microplastics and Plasticizers Around a Typical Chemical Industrial Park
AI summary Read the abstract
Plastic manufacturing facilities are an overlooked but significant local source of microplastic and chemical pollution. Sampling a river downstream of a Chinese plastics industrial park, researchers found microplastic concentrations 2.8 times higher below the plant's wastewater discharge point than upstream, with an estimated 22 trillion microplastic particles entering the environment from that single facility annually. The study also detected high levels of DEHP, a plasticizer chemical classified as an endocrine disruptor, in both water and sediments — highlighting that plastic production zones create compound pollution risks combining microplastics with hazardous chemical additives.
Presence and quantification of the microplastics and bisphenol-A in sediments along the Guanabara Bay, Brazil
AI summary Read the abstract
This study found both microplastics and bisphenol-A (BPA) in sediments across Guanabara Bay, Brazil, one of the country's most important estuarine systems. The co-occurrence of plastic particles and a hormone-disrupting chemical raises serious concerns for aquatic life and seafood consumers.
Spatial heterogeneity of microplastic pollution and associated emerging contaminants in tropical estuarine environments: Novel insights into distribution, bioavailability, and ecological risk
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found tiny plastic particles in water, mud, and seafood like shellfish and crabs in two river areas in India. These microplastics carry harmful chemicals and are getting into the food chain, which could affect the safety of seafood that people eat. While the current risk appears low, this research shows we need better policies to reduce plastic pollution to protect both ocean ecosystems and human food sources.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.