We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Biodegradable mulch films promote sugarcane growth by regulating rhizosphere microbial communities and predicted nutrient cycling-related functional potentials
AI summary Read the abstract
Farmers commonly cover soil with plastic sheeting to boost crop growth, but this "conventional" plastic breaks down into microplastic pollution that lingers in soil for years. This study found that swapping in a biodegradable alternative not only avoids that plastic buildup, but as it breaks down naturally, it actually enriches beneficial soil microbes and boosts sugarcane yields by over 17%. While this research focused on farm soil rather than direct human health effects, reducing microplastic accumulation in agricultural land is a meaningful step toward limiting the plastic particles that can eventually make their way into our food and water
Introduction Conventional polyethylene (PE) mulch causes persistent soil plastic pollution; biodegradable mulch films (BMFs) may avoid this, but their effects on sugarcane rhizosphere microbes and yield are unclear. Methods Using a field trial in Yunnan, we compared polyethylene mulch (PM) with two PBAT/PLA-based biodegradable mulch films (BMFs) differing in thickness (Thick Film, BTK, 0.008 mm; Thin Film, BTH, 0.005 mm). Rhizosphere soil (0–40 cm) physicochemical properties, bacterial (16S) and fungal (18S) communities, predicted microbial functional potentials, and sugarcane agronomic traits were analyzed. Results BMFs degradation released organic carbon that significantly altered the rhizosphere microenvironment, increasing soil pH, organic matter, and available potassium relative to PM. These physicochemical changes drove microbial community differentiation. Compared with PM, BMFs increased the relative abundances of Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria , and Basidiomycota , while decreasing Actinobacteria and Ascomycota ( p < 0.05). BMFs also enhanced microbial α-diversity, with bacterial diversity being higher under BTK and fungal diversity under BTH. Neutral model analysis revealed that bacterial community assembly was dominated by stochastic processes; however, BMFs reduced dispersal limitation and strengthened deterministic environmental filtering, particularly under the BTH treatment, due to enhanced microhabitat heterogeneity from faster degradation. These community shifts were associated with enriched predicted sulfur (dsrAB) and nitrogen (nosZ, nif) cycling genes and more complex, cooperative bacterial–fungal interaction networks, with BTH exhibiting higher network complexity and positive interactions. These microbial responses were associated with improved sugarcane performance. Compared with PM, BMFs increased single stalk weight by 8.76%−11.68%, millable stalk number by 4.99%−7.38%, and cane yield by 17.11%−17.40%. Discussion Collectively, our results demonstrate that BMFs, through degradation-driven microhabitat alteration, strengthen deterministic assembly, promote functionally specialized taxa and cooperative networks, and enhance predicted nutrient cycling potentials, thereby improving sugarcane productivity and offering a sustainable alternative to PE mulch.
More Papers Like This
Biodegradable Film Mulching Increases Soil Carbon Sequestration and Microbial Network Complexity in a Long-Term Field Study
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists studied biodegradable plastic mulch (the plastic sheeting farmers use to cover soil) and found it helps soil store more carbon and support healthier microbial communities compared to regular plastic mulch. However, the biodegradable plastic still breaks down into microplastics in the soil, raising questions about long-term environmental effects. This matters because while biodegradable farm plastics may help fight climate change by storing carbon, we still need to understand how the microplastics they leave behind might affect our food system.
Biochar Mitigates the Negative Effects of Microplastics on Sugarcane Growth by Altering Soil Nutrients and Microbial Community Structure and Function
AI summary Read the abstract
Microplastic contamination in sugarcane-growing soils in China reduces crop biomass and degrades soil nutrients and microbial diversity. Adding biochar to microplastic-polluted soil helped offset these harms — restoring sugarcane growth, stabilizing soil pH, and improving bacterial community richness. The findings suggest biochar is a practical tool for rehabilitating agricultural land affected by plastic pollution.
Biochar Mitigates the Negative Effects of Microplastics on Sugarcane Growth by Changing Soil Nutrients and Microbial Community Structure and Function
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated the effects of microplastics with and without biochar amendment on sugarcane growth, soil biochemical properties, and microbial community structure in red soil using a potted experiment, finding that microplastics alone reduced dry biomass, soil pH, and nitrogen and phosphorus contents and decreased bacterial diversity. Biochar addition mitigated the negative effects of microplastics by improving soil nutrients and reshaping microbial community structure and function.
Data from: Degradable versus inert microplastics: Effects on soil organic carbon persistence via microbial drivers in an agroecosystem
AI summary Read the abstract
Farm soil plastic pollution isn't all the same: a new field study finds that regular plastic (like plastic bags) breaks down soil carbon and depletes it over time, while "biodegradable" plastic actually helps soil microbes build more stable, long-lasting carbon stores. This matters because healthy soil carbon supports the fertile farmland that grows our food and helps fight climate change, suggesting that swapping conventional plastic mulch for biodegradable versions could be a small but meaningful win for both agriculture and the planet.
The Structural and Functional Responses of Rhizosphere Bacteria to Biodegradable Microplastics in the Presence of Biofertilizers
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied how biodegradable microplastics interact with biofertilizers in crop soils and found that even though biodegradable plastics are designed as greener alternatives, they still significantly altered soil bacterial communities and disrupted carbon metabolism pathways. The findings suggest that biodegradable microplastics may affect soil health differently than conventional plastics, but are not necessarily harmless.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.