We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastic ingestion in the benthopelagic tank goby Glossogobius giuris is shaped by environmental exposure and ecomorphological traits.
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found tiny plastic bits (microplastics) in the guts of over half the fish they studied from two Indian rivers, with the mouth shape of the fish—not its size or sex—playing a big role in how much plastic it accidentally swallowed while feeding. This matters because it shows plastic pollution can enter the food chain through fish we may eventually eat, and it means scientists can't just use one "typical" fish species to measure plastic pollution everywhere—different fish pick up plastic differently based on how they eat.
Resident biota is often used as a proxy for microplastic (MP) contamination in aquatic ecosystems; however, species-specific ecological traits such as habitat preference, feeding strategy, and morphological and anatomical adaptations may influence MP uptake, thereby limiting the universal applicability of a single species as a bioindicator. Therefore, widely distributed species occurring across differentially contaminated aquatic ecosystems require focused evaluation. In the present study, we investigated MP ingestion in the benthopelagic tank goby Glossogobius giuris from two contrasting river systems (Bhima and Ulhas rivers) to examine how environmental exposure and ecomorphological traits together shape MP burden. MPs were isolated from gastrointestinal (GI) tracts, characterized by microscopy, and polymer identity was confirmed using Raman spectroscopy. High-resolution micro-computed tomography (μCT) was used to comprehend the structure and role of feeding-related oral and pharyngeal morphology in MPs ingestion and retention. MPs were detected in 52.94% of individuals, with higher prevalence in the Bhima River than in the Ulhas River. In total, 47 mainly fragments and films composed of polyethylene and polypropylene were recorded, indicating their origin from secondary anthropogenic sources. Biometric and life-history traits such as size, body condition, sex, or reproductive state showed no significant relationship with MP abundance. Instead, patterns of ingestion appear to reflect both habitat-associated exposure and species-specific feeding behavior, suggesting a possible role of oral structures in MPs intake. The μCT observations provide evidence for the involvement of oral and pharyngeal structures to facilitate incidental MP particle capture and short-term retention during prey acquisition. The results of the present investigation suggest that the designation of any species as a bioindicator should be undertaken with caution, as MP ingestion, retention, and egestion are highly species-specific processes governed by ecological context, trophic behaviour, and feeding-related morphology.
More Papers Like This
Selective ingestion drives divergence between environmental and gut microplastics in riverine fishes
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists studying fish in a Bangladesh river found something surprising: how much microplastic pollution is in the water doesn't match how much ends up in fish guts. Instead, fish seem to preferentially swallow certain types of plastic—especially larger pieces, foam bits, fibers, and blue or black particles—meaning the plastic risk isn't just about how polluted the water is, but what *kind* of plastic is floating around. Since many of us eat fish, this matters because it suggests we should track the specific types of microplastics in waterways, not just total amounts, to better understand what's actually ending up on our plates.
Does the mouth size influence microplastic ingestion in fishes?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined microplastic contamination in six tropical fish species with different mouth sizes from Saint Martin's Island in the Bay of Bengal. The study found that mouth size did influence microplastic ingestion rates, with larger-mouthed species generally accumulating more particles, suggesting that feeding morphology plays a role in microplastic uptake.
Effect of biological and environmental factors on microplastic ingestion of commercial fish species
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed microplastic ingestion in commercially important fish species, evaluating how biological and environmental factors influence ingestion rates across 2,222 individual fish. The study assessed gastrointestinal tract contents to determine the extent and patterns of microplastic contamination. The findings suggest that both species-specific biology and environmental conditions play important roles in determining microplastic ingestion levels in commercial fish.
The influence of exposure and physiology on microplastic ingestion by the freshwater fish Rutilus rutilus (roach) in the River Thames, UK
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined microplastic ingestion by roach in the River Thames and found synthetic particles in fish from six of seven sampling sites, with ingestion rates linked to local microplastic exposure levels and fish feeding behavior. The study suggests that both environmental concentration and physiological factors like gut morphology and diet influence how much microplastic freshwater fish consume.
Microplastic in riverine fish is connected to species traits
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured microplastic contamination in fish and surface waters from three Lake Michigan tributaries and found that a fish's feeding behavior — particularly bottom-feeding — was a stronger predictor of microplastic ingestion than the local water concentration. Round goby bottom-feeders had the highest microplastic loads, suggesting that food web position plays a key role in how microplastics accumulate in freshwater fish.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.