We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Investigations into the flocculent settling of microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Wastewater treatment plants are one of the ways tiny plastic particles get into our rivers and lakes, but this study found that adjusting conditions in the treatment process—specifically increasing the concentration of sludge (the mix of bacteria and solids that helps clean water)—can boost microplastic removal from about 55% up to 94%. This matters because the more microplastics plants can filter out before water is released into the environment, the fewer end up in waterways, soil, and eventually our food and drinking water.
ABSTRACT Figure showing a summary of experimental setup for settling experiments, effect of sludge concentration on microplastic removal efficiency, and the isoremoval plots for microplastics with depth and settling time. Sewage treatment plants (STPs) act as both significant sinks and sources of microplastics (MPs) in the environment. However, there is a lack of investigations into the flocculent settling characteristics of MPs and their removal trends in secondary clarifiers. Therefore, this study attempted to explore the flocculent settling behaviour of small-sized (15–105 μm) MPs of polymer types: nylon, polystyrene, polypropylene, and low-density polyethylene through controlled lab-scale experiments. Results showed that the MPs’ removal with flocculent settling improved from 55 to over 80% as sludge mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration increased from 50 to ∼1,000 mg/L, highlighting the importance of MLSS in MPs’ retention. Furthermore, a lab-scale prototype of a secondary clarifier was used to study flocculent settling trends of a mixture of rising and settling polymers, and iso-removal plots for MPs’ flocculent settling were plotted, which provide an estimation of secondary clarifier removal efficiencies. It was observed that approximately 94% of MPs were effectively removed in secondary clarifiers under optimized conditions. This study provides novel insights into the flocculent settling characteristics of MPs in secondary treatment, improving our understanding of their fate in STPs and strategies to enhance MP removal efficiency.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics removal through water treatment plants: Its feasibility, efficiency, future prospects and enhancement by proper waste management
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed over 80 studies on water treatment plant performance and found microplastic removal ranges widely — from 16% in basic primary treatment up to near 100% with advanced membrane systems — but a major flaw is that removed microplastics concentrate in sludge, which can re-enter the environment. The review recommends optimizing coagulants and sludge treatment to prevent microplastics from simply being relocated rather than eliminated.
Selected unit processes in microplastics removal from water and wastewater
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists tested how well common water treatment methods remove tiny plastic particles (microplastics) from water, and found that simple settling doesn't work well, most plastic bits just float. However, adding chemicals to clump particles together (a process called coagulation) removed up to 89% of certain plastic fibers, though it barely touched PVC particles, and oil in the water actually helped trap some plastics. This matters because it shows our current water treatment plants may let significant amounts of microplastics slip through into drinking water, and points to specific improvements, like better handling of oily wastewater, that could help keep more plastic out of the water we drink.
Impacts of Wastewater Treatment Processes on the Occurrence Characteristics and Morphologies of Microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Wastewater treatment plants don't fully filter out microplastics before sending water back into rivers and lakes, tiny fragments (under half a millimeter), fibers, and certain plastic types like PVC and PS are especially likely to slip through. The good news: this study found that tweaking plant operations, like extending how long wastewater and sludge stay in treatment, and upgrading filtration equipment, could significantly cut microplastic pollution, which matters since these particles can end up in drinking water and food sources, potentially affecting long-term human exposure.
The Effect of Wastewater Treatment Plants on Retainment of Plastic Microparticles to Enhance Water Quality—A Review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examined how well wastewater treatment plants remove microplastics, finding that most conventional systems achieve high removal rates but still discharge significant plastic quantities in treated effluent and sludge. Improving treatment efficiency and preventing sludge application to farmland are key strategies for reducing microplastic release.
Fate of Microplastic Pollution Along the Water and Sludge Lines in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers evaluated microplastic abundance and distribution across three municipal wastewater treatment plants using different treatment technologies. The study found that all three plants achieved greater than 97% microplastic removal along the water treatment line, with microplastics concentrating in the sludge fraction, underscoring the important role of sludge treatment in sequestering microplastics from wastewater.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.