0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Comment on egusphere-2025-1821

2025

AI summary Read the abstract

This is a peer review comment on an atmospheric microplastics preprint characterizing source profiles and emission factors from plastic burning, road traffic, and agricultural sources, contributing to the open review process for improving the study.

Abstract. Research on atmospheric microplastics (MPs) from typical sources is limited, constraining the targeted management of pollution. Here, the characteristics and source profiles of eight types of common MPs and three classes of plasticizers (phthalates, benzothiazole and its derivatives, bisphenol A) emitted from plastic burning (PB), fruit bag burning (FB), road traffic (RT), agricultural film (AF) and livestock breeding (LB) sources were determined in PM2.5 and PM10 in the Guanzhong Plain, northern China. PB features high proportions of poly(methyl methacrylate) and 2-hydroxy benzothiazole, with poly(methyl methacrylate) being more abundant in coarse particles (PMcoarse). FB exhibits the higher proportion of di-n-octyl phthalate in PMcoarse than PM2.5. RT shows a distinguishable profile with high abundances of rubber. The abundance of 2-benzothiazolyl-N-morpholinosulfide in PMcoarse was twice that in PM2.5 for RT. Polystyrene is the most abundant MP in AF. LB shows the distinguishing feature of benzothiazoles, especially 2-benzothiazolyl-N-morpholinosulfide and N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazolesulfenamide. The eco-health risk assessments reveal combustion-derived MPs (PB and FB) pose the highest ecological risk (Level III). Elevated hazard indices to human health were observed in LB and PB, primarily attributed to bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. Notably, poly(methyl methacrylate, polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene, bisphenol A and phthalates emerged as key drivers of oxidative stress. This study advances the understanding of atmospheric MPs, offering critical insights for source tracking and risk assessment to mitigate their eco-health effects.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Comment on egusphere-2025-1821

AI summary Read the abstract

This is a peer review comment on an atmospheric microplastics study examining MP source profiles from plastic burning, road traffic, and agricultural sources, part of the open peer review process for the preprint.

Article Tier 2

Comment on egusphere-2025-1821

AI summary Read the abstract

This is a peer review comment on an atmospheric microplastics preprint examining source profiles and emission factors for plastic-derived particles from various pollution sources, contributing to the open review process for the manuscript.

Article Tier 2

Comment on egusphere-2025-1821

AI summary Read the abstract

This is a peer review comment on an atmospheric microplastics preprint studying MP emission sources, contributing to the open peer review process for the study.

Article Tier 2

Comment on egusphere-2025-1821

AI summary Read the abstract

This peer review comment on an atmospheric microplastics study characterizes source profiles and emission factors for eight polymer types and three plasticizer classes from plastic burning, fruit bag burning, road traffic, agricultural film, and livestock breeding sources.

Article Tier 2

Comment on egusphere-2025-1821

AI summary Read the abstract

This comment discusses a study characterizing source profiles for atmospheric microplastics, including particles from plastic burning, fruit waste degradation, and other common sources, offering guidance for distinguishing emission sources in ambient air monitoring.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper