Reply to 'Polypropylene mesh degradation and systemic disease: biological plausibility is not clinical evidence'

Nicholas T. H. Farr; Pascal Achenbach; Karl-Dietrich Sievert

doi:10.1038/s41585-026-01159-2

0

Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Reply to 'Polypropylene mesh degradation and systemic disease: biological plausibility is not clinical evidence'

Original title: Reply to ‘Polypropylene mesh degradation and systemic disease: biological plausibility is not clinical evidence’

Nature Reviews Urology 2026

Nicholas T. H. Farr, Pascal Achenbach, Karl-Dietrich Sievert

No summary available — this paper's abstract is not included in the open metadata provided by the publisher. Learn why →