0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Charge Matters, but So Does Species: Amphibian Early Development under Exposure to Clean Dialyzed Nanoplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists exposed frog embryos to tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) with different electrical charges and found that both the charge and the dose affected how harmful they were—causing growth problems, developmental defects, and disrupted gene activity linked to energy production and cell structure. While this study was done in frogs, not humans, it matters because it shows nanoplastics can cause biological harm even at low, "sublethal" levels, and gives researchers a faster, more precise way to test how these increasingly common pollutants might affect development in humans and other animals.

Polymers

Nanoplastics (NPs) are emerging aquatic contaminants, yet their impacts on amphibians remain poorly resolved despite their ecological relevance and developmental sensitivity. We assessed developmental, behavioral, and transcriptomic responses in early life-stage Xenopus laevis exposed to clean, dialyzed polystyrene NPs bearing negative carboxyl (PS-COOH) or positive amine (PS-NH 2 ) surface charges, tested individually and in binary mixtures (0.1–10 ppm). Particle characterization indicated limited aggregation but medium-driven surface transformations, including charge shifts yielding net negative ζ-potentials for PS-NH 2 . Toxicity was charge-dependent, with elevated mortality in PS-COOH exposures and deformities observed across treatments. Morphometric analyses revealed reduced body length, head and trunk height, and eye area, with stronger effects in PS-NH 2 and mixture groups, while behavioral responses were modest. Transcriptomic profiling showed widespread downregulation of coding genes and long noncoding RNAs. PS-COOH suppressed oxidative phosphorylation, ribosomal function, and peptide metabolism pathways, whereas PS-NH 2 disrupted cytoskeletal organization, adhesion signaling, and extracellular interaction networks in a dose-responsive manner. Mixtures produced distinct signatures enriched in extracellular matrix and enzymatic processes. Integrated mixture modeling indicated predominantly additive responses with antagonistic deviations across biological levels. Collectively, amphibian early-life stages show high sensitivity to sublethal NP exposure and represent a promising New Approach Methodology platform for mechanistically informed nanoplastic risk assessment.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Charge Matters,but So Does Species: Amphibian EarlyDevelopment under Exposure to Clean Dialyzed Nanoplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists exposed developing frog embryos to tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) with different electrical charges and found that both the charge and the amount mattered a lot: some particles caused higher death rates, while others caused body deformities and disrupted genes involved in energy production and cell structure. While this study was done in frogs, not humans, it adds to growing evidence that nanoplastics—which are increasingly found in water, food, and even human blood—can interfere with healthy development at the cellular level, underscoring why researchers are working to understand these tiny, hard-to-detect pollutants before they become a bigger health concern.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics under the charge effects: Unveiling the potential threats to amphibian (Rana nigromaculata) growth, intestinal damage and microbial ecology

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed frog tadpoles to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that both types reduced survival rates, with positively charged particles causing more severe intestinal damage. The positively charged nanoplastics triggered greater oxidative stress in gut tissue and significantly disrupted the diversity of beneficial gut bacteria involved in nutrient absorption. The study suggests that the surface charge of nanoplastics plays an important role in determining how harmful they are to aquatic organisms.

Article Tier 2

Differentially Charged Nanoplastics Induce Distinct Effects on the Growth and Gut of Benthic Insects (Chironomus kiinensis) via Charge-Specific Accumulation and Perturbation of the Gut Microbiota

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed aquatic insect larvae to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that the surface charge significantly affected how toxic the particles were. Positively charged nanoplastics caused more severe gut damage, greater accumulation in tissues, and bigger disruptions to gut bacteria. This matters because nanoplastics in the real environment carry various charges, and the findings suggest that charge is an important factor in determining health risks.

Article Tier 2

A heart-on-a-chip simultaneously monitoring mechanical and electrophysiologic signals reveals charge-dependent micro/nano plastic cardiotoxicity

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists using a lab-made "heart-on-a-chip" found that tiny plastic particles (microplastics) can weaken heart cell function, and the particles' electrical charge matters a lot—positively charged plastic bits caused the most damage by disrupting calcium channels that help heart cells beat properly. This matters because microplastics are already being found in human blood and heart tissue, and this research suggests that not all plastic pollution poses equal risk—the charge on these particles, which can change as plastic breaks down in the environment, may be a key factor in how harmful they are to our hearts.

Article Tier 2

Charge-specific adverse effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on zebrafish (Danio rerio) development and behavior

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed developing zebrafish to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that the positively charged particles were significantly more toxic, accumulating in the brain and gut and causing developmental delays and brain cell death. The two types of nanoplastics affected different neurotransmitter pathways and interacted with different brain receptors, explaining their distinct behavioral effects. The study demonstrates that the surface charge of nanoplastics plays a critical role in determining their toxicity to developing organisms.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper