We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Nanoplastics under the charge effects: Unveiling the potential threats to amphibian (Rana nigromaculata) growth, intestinal damage and microbial ecology
Summary
Researchers exposed frog tadpoles to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that both types reduced survival rates, with positively charged particles causing more severe intestinal damage. The positively charged nanoplastics triggered greater oxidative stress in gut tissue and significantly disrupted the diversity of beneficial gut bacteria involved in nutrient absorption. The study suggests that the surface charge of nanoplastics plays an important role in determining how harmful they are to aquatic organisms.
Nanoplastics (NPs) are contaminants that may be found in charged forms in the environment, capable of accumulating in aquatic organisms and affecting their health. This study compared the effects of positively charged Polystyrene-NPs (PS-NH, 30 nm) and negatively charged Polystyrene-NPs (PS-COOH, 30 nm) at 6 and 60 mg/L on the growth and development of black-spotted frog tadpoles (Rana nigromaculata), as well as on intestinal damage and microbial ecology. The results demonstrated that exposure to both types of NPs significantly reduced the survival rate of tadpoles, while significantly increased their body weight and body length. Compared to PS-COOH, PS-NH exposure resulted in more adverse intestinal tissue damage, manifested by more severe intestinal oxidative stress. Furthermore, exposure to PS-NH significantly reduced the abundance and diversity of the microbiome associated with gut function and nutrient absorption, thereby indirectly causing more severe intestinal damage and growth changes. In addition, functional prediction and gene transcription analysis showed that exposure to charged PS-NPs caused changes in genes associated with glycolysis and lipid metabolism, indicating that the glucose-lipid metabolism of tadpoles is impacted. This study revealed the effects of different charged NPs exposure on the growth of tadpoles and their intestinal toxicity, clarified the potential connections between gut microbiota and glucose-lipid metabolism, and provided a new perspectives on the health risks of NPs in amphibians.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Differentially Charged Nanoplastics Induce Distinct Effects on the Growth and Gut of Benthic Insects (Chironomus kiinensis) via Charge-Specific Accumulation and Perturbation of the Gut Microbiota
Researchers exposed aquatic insect larvae to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that the surface charge significantly affected how toxic the particles were. Positively charged nanoplastics caused more severe gut damage, greater accumulation in tissues, and bigger disruptions to gut bacteria. This matters because nanoplastics in the real environment carry various charges, and the findings suggest that charge is an important factor in determining health risks.
Nanoplastics Drive the Charge-specific Decline of Aquatic Insect (Chironomus kiinensis) Emergence through Inducing Oxidative Damage and Perturbing the Endocrine System
Researchers found that nanoplastics with a positive electrical charge were more harmful to aquatic insects than negatively charged ones, reducing emergence rates by over 22% at environmentally relevant concentrations. The positively charged particles were absorbed more easily by larvae due to stronger attraction to cell membranes, causing greater oxidative damage and hormonal disruption.
Integrated multilevel investigation of photosynthesis revealed the algal response distinction to differentially charged nanoplastics
This study investigated how nanoplastics with different electrical charges affect algae, which form the base of aquatic food chains. Positively charged nanoplastics caused the most severe damage, disrupting photosynthesis and damaging cell structures, while neutral and negatively charged particles had milder or even stimulating effects at low levels. Since algae health directly affects the entire aquatic food web, this research helps explain how nanoplastic pollution could ripple through ecosystems and ultimately impact seafood safety.
Charge-specific adverse effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on zebrafish (Danio rerio) development and behavior
Researchers exposed developing zebrafish to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that the positively charged particles were significantly more toxic, accumulating in the brain and gut and causing developmental delays and brain cell death. The two types of nanoplastics affected different neurotransmitter pathways and interacted with different brain receptors, explaining their distinct behavioral effects. The study demonstrates that the surface charge of nanoplastics plays a critical role in determining their toxicity to developing organisms.
Distinct lipid membrane interaction and uptake of differentially charged nanoplastics in bacteria
Researchers studied how nanoplastics with different surface charges interact with bacterial cell membranes, finding that positively charged particles penetrate bacteria far more effectively than neutral or negatively charged ones. The positively charged nanoplastics caused more cellular stress by generating reactive oxygen species and damaged cell structures differently depending on the bacterial type. These findings are important for understanding how nanoplastics may affect both environmental bacteria and the human microbiome.