0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Atmospheric microplastics: A review of pollution characteristics, human exposure pathways, and emerging health risks

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
MohammadAmin Azizi, Zahra Khashi, Razieh Ashoori, Farzaneh Rostami, Abooalfazl Azhdarpoor

Summary

This comprehensive review examines microplastic pollution in indoor and outdoor air, highlighting exposure pathways and emerging health risks. Researchers found that poorly ventilated indoor spaces have the highest concentrations of airborne microplastics, while factors like humidity and ventilation significantly influence pollution levels, raising concerns about chronic inhalation exposure.

Microplastics (MPs) pollution is a growing environmental issue due to excessive plastic use and improper waste disposal. While early studies focused on MPs in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, recent research has expanded to include air quality. This comprehensive narrative review examines MP concentrations in both indoor and outdoor air, highlighting that poorly ventilated indoor spaces have the highest levels of MPs, while good ventilation helps reduce pollution. Factors such as humidity and precipitation decrease MP concentrations through particle deposition, while temperature, wind, and environmental conditions influence their dispersion and persistence. Effective management of environmental conditions and ventilation design is essential to reduce human exposure to MPs. MPs in indoor and outdoor environments show distinct characteristics. Indoor MPs are mostly small (<30 μm), transparent or black, and mainly appear as fibers, originating from textiles, carpets, and furniture. Outdoor MPs are more diverse, often found as fragments and composed of polymers like polystyrene (PS), polyethylene (PE), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Human exposure to MPs occurs primarily through inhalation and ingestion, with indoor environments posing higher risks due to particle accumulation and prolonged human presence. Fine MPs (<10 μm, especially ≤2.5 μm) can penetrate deep into the lungs, causing inflammation, oxidative stress, and systemic toxicity. Ingestion through dust is particularly concerning for infants and toddlers. Despite increasing evidence of health risks, the lack of standardized methods and regulatory limits highlights the urgent need for harmonized exposure assessment and targeted public health interventions. By synthesizing existing literature, this review provides a qualitative assessment of the current state of knowledge, identifies key research gaps, and discusses implications for future policy and exposure mitigation strategies.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Review Tier 2

A review of atmospheric microplastics pollution: In-depth sighting of sources, analytical methods, physiognomies, transport and risks

This review provides an in-depth analysis of atmospheric microplastic pollution, examining sources, detection methods, physical characteristics, transport mechanisms, and health risks. Researchers found that indoor environments tend to contain higher concentrations of airborne microplastics than outdoor settings, and that current detection methods are limited in their ability to capture the smallest particles. The study emphasizes the need for standardized sampling procedures and more research into the health effects of inhaling microplastic particles.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence of Microplastics in the Atmosphere: An Overview on Sources, Analytical Challenges, and Human Health Effects

This review examines microplastic pollution in the atmosphere, covering both indoor and outdoor sources and the challenges of measuring airborne particles. Researchers found that indoor environments, where people spend most of their time, can have particularly high concentrations of microplastics from synthetic textiles and household items. The study highlights that inhaling airborne microplastics is an important but under-studied route of human exposure.

Article Tier 2

Atmospheric Microplastics: Perspectives on Origin, Abundances, Ecological and Health Risks

This review summarizes current knowledge about microplastics in the atmosphere, including their sources, how far they travel, and potential health effects from inhalation. Researchers found that airborne microplastics can carry toxic chemicals deep into the respiratory system and may contribute to respiratory problems and other health concerns. The study emphasizes that atmospheric microplastic pollution remains poorly understood due to a lack of standardized measurement methods.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics Aloft: A comprehensive exploration of sources, transport, variations, interactions and their implications on human health in the atmospheric realm

This review summarizes research on airborne microplastics and finds that indoor environments typically contain far more microplastic particles than outdoor air -- up to 760,000 particles per square meter per day indoors versus a maximum of about 1,159 outdoors. Sources include synthetic clothing, plastic manufacturing, and even ocean spray. Inhaled microplastics can reach deep into the lungs and potentially enter the bloodstream, raising concerns about respiratory and cardiovascular health effects.

Article Tier 2

Atmospheric Microplastics and Human Health: Sources, Exposure, and Risks

This review systematically summarizes the sources, distribution, and health implications of atmospheric microplastics in both indoor and outdoor air. The study highlights growing evidence that inhaled microplastics can enter the human body and pose potential risks to the respiratory system, while identifying key limitations and uncertainties in current exposure assessment methods.

Share this paper