We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Impact of Minerals (Ferrihydrite and Goethite) and Their Organo-Mineral Complexes on Fate and Transport of Nanoplastics in the Riverine and Terrestrial Environments
Summary
Researchers studied how common iron minerals and their organic matter complexes affect the movement and fate of nanoplastics in river and soil environments. The study found that pure minerals had higher sorption capacity for nanoplastics than their organo-mineral counterparts, and goethite-based systems caused greater aggregation and retention of nanoplastics, suggesting that soil mineral composition plays an important role in nanoplastic transport.
Abundantly occurring minerals are detrimental in dictating nanoplastics (NPs) fate and transport in the environment. However, in natural scenarios, minerals barely exist in their pure phases. Minerals are often associated with organic matter and form organo-mineral complexes (OMCs), exhibiting different reactivity than their pure mineral phase. In this study, we investigated the impact of ferrihydrite, its weathering-originated secondary mineral goethite, and their corresponding OMCs, i.e., organo-ferrihydrite (O-Fh) and organo-goethite (O-Goe) on NPs mobility under varying environmental conditions (ionic strength, pH, and river water). Results showed higher sorption capacity of minerals compared to their respective OMCs for NPs, i.e., ferrihydrite (529.62 mg/g), O-Fh (439.08 mg/g), goethite (823.64 mg/g), and O-Goe (688.88 mg/g). Zeta potential and sedimentation kinetic studies suggested higher heteroaggregation and coagulation in the goethite-NPs bimodal system. NPs-minerals/OMCs interaction mechanisms were confirmed by FTIR and XPS analysis. Column transport experiments and DLVO analysis revealed that minerals/OMCs coated sand showed higher NPs retention than bare quartz sand under different pore water chemistry. Ferrihydrite and goethite coated sand columns have shown maximum NPs retention (>95%). Our study provides insight into how environmentally relevant mineral phases and thier corresponding OMCs impact NPs fate and transport in aqueous and terrestrial environments.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Impactof Minerals(Ferrihydrite and Goethite) andTheir Organo-Mineral Complexes on Fate and Transport of Nanoplasticsin the Riverine and Terrestrial Environments
Researchers investigated how iron minerals ferrihydrite and goethite, along with their organo-mineral complexes, influence the mobility and transport of nanoplastics in riverine and terrestrial environments, finding that organic matter coatings substantially alter nanoplastic behavior compared to pure mineral phases.
Nanoplastics interaction with feldspar and weathering originated secondary minerals (kaolinite and gibbsite) in the riverine environment
Researchers studied how nanoplastics interact with common river minerals (feldspar, kaolinite, and gibbsite) in freshwater environments. Nanoplastics adsorbed onto mineral surfaces, with the type of mineral and water chemistry affecting how strongly they stuck. Understanding these interactions helps predict how nanoplastics move through rivers and how available they are to living organisms.
Influence of magnetite and its weathering originated maghemite and hematite minerals on sedimentation and transport of nanoplastics in the aqueous and subsurface environments
Researchers compared how three iron oxide minerals — magnetite, maghemite, and hematite — affect nanoplastic sorption and transport in aqueous and subsurface environments, finding that magnetite's smaller size, positive surface charge, and higher surface hydroxyl density make it the most effective at capturing nanoplastics and limiting their mobility in river water-saturated sand columns.
Charge mediated interaction of polystyrene nanoplastic (PSNP) with minerals in aqueous phase
Researchers investigated how polystyrene nanoplastics interact with common soil and sediment minerals, finding that positively charged iron oxide minerals (goethite and magnetite) strongly adsorb nanoplastics via electrostatic attraction and hydrogen bonding, while negatively charged clay minerals do not — providing mechanistic insight into how nanoplastics may accumulate in iron-rich soils and sediments.
Impact of iron/aluminum (hydr)oxide and clay minerals on heteroaggregation and transport of nanoplastics in aquatic environment
Researchers examined how polystyrene nanoplastics interact with nine different minerals in aquatic environments, finding that positively charged iron and aluminum (hydr)oxide minerals readily form aggregates with nanoplastics through electrostatic and hydrophobic forces, while humic acid and shifting pH significantly suppress this aggregation.