We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Influence of magnetite and its weathering originated maghemite and hematite minerals on sedimentation and transport of nanoplastics in the aqueous and subsurface environments
Summary
Researchers compared how three iron oxide minerals — magnetite, maghemite, and hematite — affect nanoplastic sorption and transport in aqueous and subsurface environments, finding that magnetite's smaller size, positive surface charge, and higher surface hydroxyl density make it the most effective at capturing nanoplastics and limiting their mobility in river water-saturated sand columns.
Persistent nanoplastics (NPs) and their interaction with ubiquitous iron oxide minerals (IOMs) require a detailed understanding to dictate NPs fate and transport in aqueous and subsurface environments. Current study emphasizes on understanding nanoplastics (NPs) interaction with magnetite, and its weathering-originated mineral colloids, i.e., maghemite and hematite under varying environmental conditions (pH, humic acid, ionic strength and water matrix). Results showed that the higher surface hydroxyl group, smaller particle size, and positive surface charge of magnetite led to maximum NPs sorption (805.8 mg/g) in comparison to maghemite (602 mg/g) and hematite (384.3 mg/g). Charge distribution and sedimentation kinetic studies in bimodal systems showed enhanced coagulation in magnetite-NPs system. FTIR and XPS analysis of NPs-IOMs reaction precipitate revealed the vital role of surface functionality in their interaction. Column experiments revealed higher NPs retention in IOMs-coated quartz sand than bare quartz sand. Further, in river water (RW), magnetite-coated sand has shown maximum NPs retention (>80 %) than maghemite (62 %) and hematite (52 %), suggesting limited NPs mobility in the presence of magnetite in subsurface conditions. These findings elucidated the dependence of NPs fate on IOMs in freshwater systems and illustrated IOMs impact on NPs mobility in the subsurface porous environment.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Impact of Minerals (Ferrihydrite and Goethite) and Their Organo-Mineral Complexes on Fate and Transport of Nanoplastics in the Riverine and Terrestrial Environments
Researchers studied how common iron minerals and their organic matter complexes affect the movement and fate of nanoplastics in river and soil environments. The study found that pure minerals had higher sorption capacity for nanoplastics than their organo-mineral counterparts, and goethite-based systems caused greater aggregation and retention of nanoplastics, suggesting that soil mineral composition plays an important role in nanoplastic transport.
Impactof Minerals(Ferrihydrite and Goethite) andTheir Organo-Mineral Complexes on Fate and Transport of Nanoplasticsin the Riverine and Terrestrial Environments
Researchers investigated how iron minerals ferrihydrite and goethite, along with their organo-mineral complexes, influence the mobility and transport of nanoplastics in riverine and terrestrial environments, finding that organic matter coatings substantially alter nanoplastic behavior compared to pure mineral phases.
Comparative effects of crystalline, poorly crystalline and freshly formed iron oxides on the colloidal properties of polystyrene microplastics
Researchers found that freshly formed iron oxides caused the greatest aggregation of polystyrene microplastics in water, with effects decreasing in the order: freshly formed iron oxide > ferrihydrite > goethite > haematite. The findings suggest that iron oxide copresence can delay microplastic transport or alter their environmental fate depending on pH and crystallinity of the mineral.
Both nanoplastic and iron mineral types determine their heteroaggregation: Aggregation kinetics and interface process
Researchers measured how four types of nanoplastics aggregate with iron minerals and found that surface chemistry drives the outcome — with PMMA forming the strongest heteroaggregates and carboxyl-modified particles the weakest — and that electron transfer from nanoplastics to hematite partially reduces iron, with implications for aquatic iron cycling.
Impact of iron/aluminum (hydr)oxide and clay minerals on heteroaggregation and transport of nanoplastics in aquatic environment
Researchers examined how polystyrene nanoplastics interact with nine different minerals in aquatic environments, finding that positively charged iron and aluminum (hydr)oxide minerals readily form aggregates with nanoplastics through electrostatic and hydrophobic forces, while humic acid and shifting pH significantly suppress this aggregation.