0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Impact of iron/aluminum (hydr)oxide and clay minerals on heteroaggregation and transport of nanoplastics in aquatic environment

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022 68 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xin Nie, Xiaohui Xing, Ruiyin Xie, Jingxin Wang, Shuguang Yang, Quan Wan, Eddy Y. Zeng

Summary

Researchers examined how polystyrene nanoplastics interact with nine different minerals in aquatic environments, finding that positively charged iron and aluminum (hydr)oxide minerals readily form aggregates with nanoplastics through electrostatic and hydrophobic forces, while humic acid and shifting pH significantly suppress this aggregation.

Nanoplastics (NPs) are emerging contaminants in the environment, where the transport and fate of NPs would be greatly affected by interactions between NPs and minerals. In the present study, the interactions of two types of polystyrene nanoplastics (PSNPs), i.e., bare-PSNPs and carboxylated PSNPs-COOH, with iron (hydr)oxides (hematite, goethite, magnetite, and ferrihydrite), aluminum (hydr)oxides (boehmite and gibbsite), and clay minerals (kaolinite, montmorillonite, and illite) were investigated. The positively charged iron/aluminum (hydr)oxide minerals could form heteroaggregates with negatively charged PSNPs. Electrostatic and hydrophobic interaction dominate for the heteroaggregation of bare-PSNPs with iron/aluminum (hydr)oxide minerals, while ligand exchange and electrostatic interaction are involved in the heteroaggregation of PSNPs-COOH with iron/aluminum (hydr)oxides minerals. However, heteroaggregation between PSNPs and negatively charged clay minerals was negligible. Humic acid markedly suppressed such heteroaggregation between PSNPs and minerals due to enhanced electrostatic repulsion, steric hindrance, and competition of surface attachment sites. The heteroaggregation rates of both bare-PSNPs and PSNPs-COOH with hematite decreased with increasing solution pH. Increased ionic strength enhanced the heteroaggregation of PSNPs-COOH but inhibited that of bare-PSNPs. The results of the present study suggested that the heteroaggregation of PSNPs in environments could be strongly affected by minerals, solution pH, humic acid, and ionic strength.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Crystallinity- dependent heteroaggregation and co-sedimentation between polystyrene nanoplastics and iron (hydro)oxides

Researchers found that the crystallinity of iron (hydro)oxide minerals strongly governs their tendency to aggregate with polystyrene nanoplastics in water — higher crystallinity produces more positive surface charges, stronger electrostatic attraction, and greater hydrogen bonding with nanoplastics, ultimately controlling how and where these combined particles settle in aquatic environments.

Article Tier 2

The heteroaggregation and deposition behavior of nanoplastics on Al2O3 in aquatic environments

Researchers systematically investigated heteroaggregation between polystyrene nanoplastics and aluminum oxide particles in aquatic environments, finding significant aggregation under acidic and neutral conditions that increased with ionic strength. Humic acid and fulvic acid inhibited deposition of nanoplastics onto aluminum oxide surfaces through charge reversal and steric repulsion, with humic acid being more effective.

Article Tier 2

Charge mediated interaction of polystyrene nanoplastic (PSNP) with minerals in aqueous phase

Researchers investigated how polystyrene nanoplastics interact with common soil and sediment minerals, finding that positively charged iron oxide minerals (goethite and magnetite) strongly adsorb nanoplastics via electrostatic attraction and hydrogen bonding, while negatively charged clay minerals do not — providing mechanistic insight into how nanoplastics may accumulate in iron-rich soils and sediments.

Article Tier 2

Interaction of polystyrene nanoplastics with impurity-bearing ferrihydrite and implication on complex particle sedimentation

Researchers investigated how aluminum-, manganese-, and silicon-bearing iron mineral (ferrihydrite) impurities influence its aggregation with polystyrene nanoplastics in water, finding that aluminum impurities strengthened electrostatic attraction and increased aggregation while silicon and manganese impurities reduced it, with all aggregates showing slower sedimentation than pure ferrihydrite.

Article Tier 2

Comparative effects of crystalline, poorly crystalline and freshly formed iron oxides on the colloidal properties of polystyrene microplastics

Researchers found that freshly formed iron oxides caused the greatest aggregation of polystyrene microplastics in water, with effects decreasing in the order: freshly formed iron oxide > ferrihydrite > goethite > haematite. The findings suggest that iron oxide copresence can delay microplastic transport or alter their environmental fate depending on pH and crystallinity of the mineral.

Share this paper