We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparing outdoor and accelerated weathering of polystyrene, polyethylene and polypropylene – predicting the degradation of microplastics in the environment
Original title: Comparing outdoor and accelerated weathering of polystyrene, polyethylene and polypropylene – predicting the degradation of microplastics in the environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists tested how three common plastics (used in things like packaging, bottles, and containers) break down into microplastics when exposed to sunlight, using both real outdoor conditions and sped-up lab simulations. They found a way to accurately predict how long it actually takes plastics to degrade outdoors based on faster lab tests—and discovered that different plastic types break down at very different rates depending on temperature and sunlight exposure. This matters because it helps researchers better estimate how long microplastics linger in our environment (and potentially in our food and water), which is a key step toward understanding our real-world exposure to them.
Accelerated weathering becomes increasingly popular in microplastic research to produce defined, environmentally relevant reference particles and determine their degradation kinetics. To predict the persistence of environmental microplastics, models must be developed that correlate real-life with accelerated weathering. Therefore, we compare long-term accelerated and outdoor weathering studies using amorphous polystyrene, semi-crystalline low-density polyethylene and polypropylene particles. While mechanical stress was similar in all experiments, temperature and irradiance varied outdoors. In all cases, the particles weather due to photooxidation inducing chain scissions, polar functional groups and crosslinks. Macroscopically, particles degrade in three stages: surface abrasion, fragmentation and particle aggregation. By introducing a time-dependent acceleration factor composed of the Schwarzschild and Arrhenius laws, we derived a model with two parameters - the material-specific activation energy E A and the Schwarzschild coefficient p. While p was around 0.5 suggesting decreasing photon efficiency with increasing flux for all probed polymers, E A varied between 10 kJ/mol (PS) and 26 kJ/mol (LDPE, PP). Due to the E A differences, identical accelerated weathering durations correspond to markedly different outdoor timescales depending on polymer type and formulation. Using publicly available weather data, the model captures seasonal and regional variations more accurately than common models using average temperatures or constant acceleration factors. Synopsis: The characteristics of commodity plastics like PS, PE and PP weathered in natural environments can be predicted by parameterizing the irradiance and temperature from accelerated weathering studies.
More Papers Like This
Comparing outdoor and accelerated weathering of polystyrene, polyethylene and polypropylene – towards predicting the fate of environmental microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists tested how common plastics (like those in packaging and containers) break down into microplastics when exposed to sunlight and weather, comparing real outdoor conditions to sped-up lab simulations. They found a way to use everyday weather data to more accurately predict how fast plastics fragment into smaller pieces in different climates and seasons — which matters because knowing how quickly plastics break down helps researchers better estimate our exposure to microplastics in the environment over time.
The fragmentation of nano- and microplastic particles from thermoplastics accelerated by simulated-sunlight-mediated photooxidation
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured how quickly three common thermoplastics break down into micro- and nanoplastics under simulated sunlight exposure. Polystyrene fragmented fastest, in less than one year of equivalent real sunlight, followed by polypropylene in under two years and polyethylene in over three years. The findings help estimate how quickly plastic litter in the environment generates secondary microplastic pollution, which could inform cleanup timelines and priorities.
Abiotic weathering of plastic: Experimental contributions towards understanding the formation of microplastics and other plastic related particulate pollutants
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists studied how the five most common types of plastic break down under realistic environmental conditions involving UV light, temperature changes, and humidity. They found that weathering follows complex, uneven pathways and that the microplastics produced can have very different physical properties depending on the additives in the original plastic. This matters because it means microplastics in the environment are more varied and unpredictable than lab studies using uniform particles suggest, complicating efforts to assess their health risks.
Environmental degradation and fragmentation of microplastics: dependence on polymer type, humidity, UV dose and temperature
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers systematically tested how UV light, temperature, and humidity cause five common plastic types to break apart into secondary microplastics and nanoplastics. They found that the type of plastic — not the aging conditions — was the main factor determining how quickly it fragmented and what byproducts it released, data that can improve models predicting how plastics break down in the environment.
Unveiling the degradation dynamics of packaging plastics: Insights into the onset of microplastics formation through photodegradation
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists exposed common plastic packaging (like water bottles and food containers) to simulated sunlight to see how quickly it breaks down into microplastics, tiny plastic fragments that can end up in our food, water, and bodies. They found that thin plastic films can lose half their weight to degradation in as little as 1.4 years, with some plastics (PET) starting to break down after just 100 hours of light exposure. This matters because it shows how quickly everyday packaging can shed microplastics into the environment, reinforcing concerns about how much of this material we may be exposed to through contaminated food and water.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.