0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Detection and Quantification of Nanoplastics and Microplastics in Australian Drinking Water

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used a multi-method analytical workflow — combining pyrolysis–GC-MS, asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation, and nanoparticle tracking — to quantify both nano- and microplastics in Australian drinking water, finding tap water contained significantly higher concentrations than bottled water and estimating nanoparticle counts of 10⁶–10⁷ particles per millilitre.

Models
Study Type Environmental

Nanoplastics (10–1000 nm) are an emerging contaminant of concern in drinking water, yet quantitative data remain scarce compared to microplastics (>1000 nm). Here, we present a comprehensive assessment of both nanoplastic and microplastic contamination in Australian drinking water. An integrated analytical workflow combining pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) screening for mass concentrations, combined with asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation with multiangle light scattering (AF4-MALS) and off-line Py-GC-MS/MS, nanoparticle tracking analysis (size), and electron microscopy (morphology) was applied to quantify and characterize polymer particles across size scales. Average mass concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 μg/L for selected microplastics and 0.3 to 0.7 μg/L for nanoplastics. Tap water samples contained significantly higher concentrations than bottled water. Detected polymers included polypropylene, Nylon-66, Nylon-6, polystyrene, and polyethylene terephthalate, with lower concentrations of poly(methyl methacrylate) and polyethylene also detected. Nanoparticle counts in tap water were estimated at 106–107 particles/mL. The indicative identification of polypropylene nanoplastics demonstrates the effectiveness of the AF4-MALS–Py-GC-MS workflow for high-throughput characterization. These findings indicate the presence of polypropylene nanoplastics in drinking water and highlight the need to consider them in future assessments of water quality and potential human exposure.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Quantitative analysis of nanoplastics in environmental and potable waters by pyrolysis-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists developed and validated a new method to detect and measure nine types of nanoplastics in drinking and environmental water at very low concentrations. They found nanoplastics in every water sample tested, with polyethylene, PET, polypropylene, and polystyrene being the most common at levels up to 1.17 micrograms per liter. This is one of the first studies to quantify nanoplastics in drinking water, confirming that people are regularly exposed through their tap water.

Article Tier 2

Identification of Microplastics in Drinking Water Using Pyrolysis-GC/MS

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used pyrolysis-GC/MS to identify and quantify microplastics by polymer mass (rather than particle count) in drinking water samples. The method detected multiple polymer types and provided mass-based metrics that are more toxicologically relevant than particle counts commonly reported in water quality studies.

Article Tier 2

Identification and Quantification of Nanoplastics in Surface Water and Groundwater by Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed a method combining ultrafiltration and pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to identify and quantify nanoplastics in surface water and groundwater. The study successfully detected six types of plastic polymers at the nanoscale in environmental water samples, providing much-needed quantitative data on nanoplastic pollution in real-world water sources.

Article Tier 2

Quantifying Nanoplastics and Microplastics in Food and Beverages Using Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Implications

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists used a specialized analytical technique to measure nanoplastics and microplastics in common Australian foods and beverages, estimating that people consume about 1.7 to 2.0 milligrams of plastic per year from drinks like water, tea, coffee, beer, and wine alone. The study also highlighted that current detection methods may undercount plastic contamination in solid foods because of measurement limitations.

Article Tier 2

An optimized multi-technique based analytical platform for identification, characterization and quantification of nanoplastics in water

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed an analytical platform combining flow fractionation, light scattering, and pyrolysis-GC/MS to simultaneously identify polymer type, measure particle size distribution, and quantify nanoplastics in water samples down to 0.01 ppm, filling a key gap in nanoplastic monitoring tools.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper