0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Earthworms counteract drought-induced impairment of wheat performance at the jointing stage regardless of microplastic type

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers ran a 120-day microcosm experiment showing that earthworms (Eisenia fetida) significantly offset drought-induced wheat biomass loss at the jointing stage — increasing biomass by 57.5% under drought — regardless of whether conventional polyethylene or biodegradable PLA microplastics were present, with soil nitrate nitrogen and aggregate stability identified as the key mediating pathways.

Increasing frequency and severity of drought events severely constrain wheat production systems across arid and semi-arid landscapes. Plastic film mulching is widely used to mitigate drought in Chinese dryland agriculture, yet its extensive application has caused increasingly prominent microplastic contamination in soils. However, whether and how earthworms, key soil macro-decomposers, alleviate crop stresses from the combination of drought and microplastics remains unclear. Here, we conducted a full-factorial microcosm experiment to disentangle the individual and interactive effects of drought, microplastics, and earthworms on wheat jointing-stage biomass. Drought treatments (ambient 60% soil water-holding capacity vs. extreme 30% soil water-holding capacity) were initiated at wheat sowing and maintained continuously for 120 days with no post-drought recovery. The experiment included three microplastic treatments (no-microplastic control vs. 2.5% w/w non-biodegradable low-density polyethylene vs. 2.5% w/w biodegradable polylactic acid) and two earthworm treatments (absence vs. presence of Eisenia fetida at 2.5% w/w), with partial E. fetida survival observed across all treatments at trial termination. Our results revealed that drought significantly reduced wheat jointing-stage biomass by 8.87 g (65.6%). Biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) microplastics significantly increased biomass by 1.14 g (13.3%), whereas non-degradable low-density polyethylene (LDPE) microplastics had no significant effect. Earthworms significantly elevated biomass by 4.08 g (57.68%); crucially, they significantly mitigated drought stress, leading to a 2.08 g (57.5%) increase in wheat jointing-stage biomass under drought conditions. Further, structural equation modellings (SEMs) confirmed that drought reduced wheat jointing-stage biomass mainly by direct pathways; these detrimental effects were effectively mitigated by earthworms through increasing soil properties (e.g. soil nitrate nitrogen content, 15.63 mg kg, +131.26%; soil mean weight diameter, 0.34 mm, +5.55%). These findings suggest that soil macrofauna (e.g. earthworms) substantially buffer the adverse effects of global environmental change, enhancing crop performance in arid and semiarid regions. This evidence underscores the potential of harnessing soil biological processes to strengthen resilience of sustainable agricultural systems under global change pressures.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Earthworms mitigate drought effects on microbial decomposition of straw under varying microplastic conditions

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that earthworms could partially offset the negative effects of both biodegradable and non-degradable microplastics on microbial straw decomposition during drought conditions in Loess Plateau soils, primarily by modifying soil physical properties and microbial community composition.

Article Tier 2

Earthworm activity effectively mitigated the negative impact of microplastics on maize growth

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated whether earthworms could help reduce the harmful effects of microplastic contamination on soil and crop growth. They found that earthworm activity increased soil nutrient content, boosted microbial diversity, and promoted maize growth even in microplastic-polluted soil. The study suggests that earthworms may serve as a natural tool for managing agricultural soils contaminated with plastic particles.

Article Tier 2

Earthworms alleviate microplastics stress on soil microbial and protist communities

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that earthworms can help alleviate the negative effects of microplastic pollution on soil microbial and protist communities. In microcosm experiments, soils with earthworms showed more resilient bacterial, fungal, and protist communities when exposed to both conventional and biodegradable microplastics. The study suggests that soil macrofauna play an important role in buffering ecosystems against the disruptive effects of microplastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Earthworms drive type-dependent mitigation of microplastic-induced SOC mineralization potential in semi-arid agroecosystems: microcosm evidence

AI summary Read the abstract

In a 120-day lab experiment using soil microcosms from a semi-arid farming region in China, both biodegradable and non-biodegradable microplastics increased the breakdown of soil organic carbon by over 30%. Adding earthworms reduced this effect by about 35%, though they worked differently depending on plastic type: lowering enzyme activity with biodegradable plastics and improving soil structure with non-biodegradable plastics.

Article Tier 2

Earthworms mediate the influence of polyethylene (PE) and polylactic acid (PLA) microplastics on soil bacterial communities

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied how earthworms interact with both conventional polyethylene and biodegradable PLA microplastics in soil over 120 days. Both types of microplastics changed the composition of soil bacterial communities, but in different ways, and earthworms appeared to mediate these effects by consuming bacteria or altering soil conditions. The findings show that even biodegradable plastics disrupt soil ecosystems, and that soil organisms play a complex role in how microplastics affect the underground environment.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper