0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Yellow perch ( Perca flavescens ) show subtle changes in the cellular stress response following exposure to microplastics in large in-lake mesocosms

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed yellow perch to additive-free and additive-containing microplastic fragments in in-lake mesocosms for nine weeks and found only subtle gene expression changes — upregulation of hsp90aa, mgst1, and mhc-I — without a clear pattern distinguishing chemical from physical toxicity, suggesting additives alone do not dominate the stress response at environmental concentrations.

Microplastics are found worldwide and are ingested by a wide range of organisms, yet the drivers of toxicity of these common environmental contaminants are still not fully understood. To better understand the contribution of plastic additives in the toxicity of microplastics to organisms, yellow perch (Perca flavescens) were exposed for 9 weeks to additive-free or additive-containing microplastics using in-lake pelagic mesocosms. Microplastics were fragments (37 to 1408 µm) of polymers commonly used in consumer plastics (linear low density polyethylene, polystyrene and polyethylene terephthalate). One objective of this work was to understand the contribution of additives to the overall toxicity of microplastics on yellow perch using targeted gene expression analysis via qPCR. After 9 weeks of exposure, fish were sampled and whole fish were assessed for selected metal additives (aluminum (Al), titanium (Ti), and bismuth (Bi)), and liver and gonads were assessed for gene expression analysis. No significant differences of metal contamination in fish tissue exposed to microplastics with additives was detected in comparison with fish exposed to plastic without additives or the control. While only limited effects on gene expression were observed, our work revealed that the genes hsp90aa and mgst1 in livers and mhc-I in gonads were differentially expressed when fish were exposed to microplastics with or without additives in comparison with the control fish. This finding indicated cellular stress and detoxification responses to microplastic exposure. Overall, there was no clear pattern demonstrating that toxic effects on fish were driven by either the physical or chemical aspects of the microplastics. Future work should measure the accumulation of the organic additives and assess the health of organs using histopathology.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Understanding the contribution of plastic additive in microplastic toxicity from consumer products using fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed fathead minnows to polyethylene microplastics with and without chemical additives for 60 days to determine whether the plastic particles or their added chemicals drive toxic effects. While fish readily ingested the plastics, no significant differences in growth, survival, or body condition were observed between treatment groups. However, gene expression analysis revealed subtle biological changes, suggesting that longer-term or higher-dose studies may be needed to fully understand microplastic toxicity.

Article Tier 2

Toxic effects of polyethylene microplastics on transcriptional changes, biochemical response, and oxidative stress in common carp (Cyprinus carpio)

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed common carp to varying concentrations of polyethylene microplastics and assessed biochemical, oxidative, and gene expression changes. The study found that microplastic exposure caused significant oxidative stress, altered liver enzyme activity, and modified the expression of stress-related genes in a dose-dependent manner.

Article Tier 2

Increasing microplastic exposure had minimal effects on fatty acid composition in zooplankton and yellow perch in a large, in-lake mesocosm experiment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that increasing microplastic exposure levels had minimal effects on fatty acid composition in an aquatic organism, suggesting that at the tested concentrations, microplastics do not substantially disrupt lipid metabolism.

Article Tier 2

The effects of exposure to microplastics on grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) at the physiological, biochemical, and transcriptomic levels

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed grass carp to microplastics at two concentrations for 21 days and observed liver damage, inhibited growth, and increased oxidative stress. Transcriptome analysis revealed over 1,500 differentially expressed genes related to immune response, metabolism, and cellular stress pathways. The study suggests that microplastic exposure can trigger broad physiological and molecular disruptions in freshwater fish.

Article Tier 2

Effects of polystyrene nano- and microplastics and of microplastics with sorbed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in adult zebrafish

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed adult zebrafish to nano- and microplastic particles of different sizes, some carrying additional chemical pollutants, over a 21-day period. The study found that nanoplastics and microplastics triggered different stress responses in the fish, with nanoplastics altering antioxidant gene activity and microplastics causing liver changes. The findings suggest that particle size matters when it comes to the biological effects of plastic pollution in aquatic organisms.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper