0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

QuantificationChallenges in Polymer Analysis in UrbanRunoff and Wastewater using Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Double-ShotPyrolysis-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Figshare 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Daniele Martuscelli (21661254), Jonas B. Jensen (21661257), Luca Solari (8223507), Simona Francalanci (8223501), Peter Christensen (2640568), Jan H. Christensen (1607005)

Summary

This study optimized a two-step pressurized liquid extraction method combined with pyrolysis-GC/MS to quantify PE, PET, PP, and PS in urban runoff and wastewater, achieving 43–58% recovery rates and identifying matrix-specific calibration requirements as a key challenge for standardized analysis.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics are persistent environmental pollutants with potential risks to ecosystems and human health. This study optimized methods for isolating and quantifying polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS) in environmental water and wastewater samples using pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) combined with pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS). The optimized two-step PLE protocol, consisting of methanol pre-extraction at 100 °C followed by tetrahydrofuran (THF) at 180 °C, achieved MP recoveries of 43–58%. Calibration curves were established using both solubilized and solid MP standards, with solubilized calibrations providing higher accuracy for PET and PP. Py-GC/MS conditions were optimized at 625 °C for 40 s to ensure maximum sensitivity and reproducibility. PE and PET were identified as the dominant MPs in the wastewater samples, with concentrations of 99.4 ± 71.8 μg/L and 16.2 ± 13.3 μg/L in Avedøre, and significantly higher levels of 749.0 ± 200.0 μg/L and 56.7 ± 22.6 μg/L in Pontedera. PP and PS were detected at lower concentrations, with PP ranging from 8.2 ± 4.2 μg/L to 16.9 ± 6.5 μg/L, and PS from 2.2 ± 1.5 μg/L to 8.4 ± 2.6 μg/L. Our results highlight the challenges of MP analysis in water samples, emphasizing the impact of key method parameters (e.g., MP isolation, pyrolysis, and calibration) on analytical reliability. The proposed method enhances MP detection in different water matrices, offering a reliable approach for routine environmental monitoring. Future efforts should focus on refining protocols to improve accuracy and precision and advancing standardization to ensure consistent and accurate MP quantification.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Quantification Challenges in Polymer Analysis in Urban Runoff and Wastewater using Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Double-Shot Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

This study developed and validated a pressurized liquid extraction plus pyrolysis-GC/MS method for quantifying PE, PET, PP, and PS microplastics in urban runoff and wastewater, achieving 43–58% recoveries and addressing matrix-specific calibration challenges for standardized environmental analysis.

Article Tier 2

Quantification Challenges in Polymer Analysis in Urban Runoff and Wastewater using Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Double-Shot Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

This duplicate entry corresponds to the same pressurized liquid extraction plus pyrolysis-GC/MS optimization study for quantifying common microplastics in urban runoff and wastewater, reporting 43–58% polymer recovery rates.

Article Tier 2

Quantification Challenges in Polymer Analysis in Urban Runoff and Wastewater using Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Double-Shot Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Researchers optimized methods for isolating and measuring common microplastics like polyethylene and polystyrene in urban runoff and wastewater samples. They found that standard extraction techniques achieved only 43-58% recovery rates, and that calibration methods significantly affected measurement accuracy. The study highlights ongoing challenges in reliably quantifying microplastic pollution in real-world water samples.

Article Tier 2

Quantification of microplastics in environmental samples via pressurized liquid extraction and pyrolysis-gas chromatography

Researchers combined pressurized liquid extraction with pyrolysis-gas chromatography to quantify microplastics in environmental samples, validating the method against reference materials and real-world samples. The approach offers a quantitative, polymer-specific measurement of bulk microplastic mass in sediments and soils, complementing particle-counting methods.

Article Tier 2

Quantification of microplastic targets in environmental matrices using pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

This study developed and validated a pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry protocol for quantifying common microplastic polymer types in complex environmental matrices, providing a reliable thermal analysis method for assessing microplastic pollution.

Share this paper