We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Life Cycle Analysis of Beverage Packaging
AI summary Read the abstract
This research characterized microplastic contamination in seawater and biota from a coastal marine protected area. Despite its protected status, the marine reserve showed microplastic contamination in surface water and in the tissues of resident fish and invertebrates, indicating that formal protection from fishing does not shield ecosystems from plastic pollution.
Plastic is the leading food and item packaging material due to its lightweight characteristics. However, there have been alarming concerns over the past years since the large-scale introduction of plastic after the Second World War, and a total of 8.3 billion metric tons have been produced. This research aims to compare the environmental impact of the packaging design of several consumer products using life cycle analysis (LCA). Based on the openLCA open-source software, three beverage packaging types were compared: plastic bottles, glass bottles, and aluminium cans. The life cycle inventory (LCI) must be identified based on case studies, literature reviews and relevant assumptions to obtain the result. Then, each beverage packagings flows, process and product system was also required to be identified to run the openLCA software. The three types of packaging was compared within each CML category in terms of impact. The CML stands for "Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden". It is a research institute of the Centre for Environmental Studies at Leiden University located in the Netherlands and a procedure used to estimate the measure of environmental impact caused by the product. Based on the CML eleven impact categories, the plastic bottle was ranked as the most impactful towards the environment, followed by glass bottles and aluminium cans as the least impactful. Other than that, it may be due to the quantity of material being used, the effect of the material during processing, and the recyclable ability.
More Papers Like This
Life cycle assessment of drinks packaging: are there environmentally-friendly alternatives to plastics?
AI summary Read the abstract
This life cycle assessment of beverage packaging compared glass, aluminum, PET, HDPE, milk cartons, and Tetra Pak containers across three drink categories, finding that 100% recycled aluminum cans, Tetra Pak, and milk cartons were less environmentally impactful than plastic bottles in their respective categories.
Life-Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment of Primary Beverage Containers: Glass versus Plastic Bottles
AI summary Read the abstract
This study compared the full life-cycle environmental impacts of glass versus polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic beverage bottles using Leopold Matrix analysis. Both container types generated significant negative environmental impacts across abiotic, biotic, and anthropic components, with glass scoring -712 and plastic -690, indicating comparable harm to ecosystems and human health.
How does plastic compare with alternative materials in the packaging sector? A systematic review of LCA studies
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers systematically reviewed 53 life cycle assessment studies comparing plastic packaging to alternatives like glass, paper, and metal, finding that conventional plastics frequently have lower overall environmental impact than perceived-sustainable substitutes when full production and transport emissions are accounted for.
Integrated LCA and OPEN LCA-CML baseline analysis on environmental impact associated with the plastic packaging waste management system of Rubavu city Rwanda
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impacts of different plastic bottle waste management pathways in Rwanda, where bottles currently end up in an open dumpsite. The study identifies which waste management changes would most reduce the plastic that eventually fragments into environmental microplastics.
Life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable plastic bottles in the city of Johannesburg
AI summary Read the abstract
A life cycle assessment compared the environmental impact of single-use and reusable PET plastic water bottles in Johannesburg, South Africa. Reusable bottles had a lower overall environmental impact when used multiple times, but manufacturing and end-of-life disposal still carry significant costs. The study provides guidance for improving plastic bottle policies in South Africa.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.