0
Review Sign in to save

How does plastic compare with alternative materials in the packaging sector? A systematic review of LCA studies

Amicus Curiae 2024 17 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers systematically reviewed 53 life cycle assessment studies comparing plastic packaging to alternatives like glass, paper, and metal, finding that conventional plastics frequently have lower overall environmental impact than perceived-sustainable substitutes when full production and transport emissions are accounted for.

Polymers
Body Systems
Study Type Review

In the recent years, packaging made of conventional plastics has been increasingly replaced by materials believed to be more sustainable. However, perceived sustainability must align with scientific assessments, such as life cycle assessments (LCAs). This review analysed 53 peer-reviewed studies published in the time range 2019-2023, aiming at understanding the state of the art in LCA about the environmental impacts of packaging by focusing on the comparison between plastics and alternative materials. The literature showed that consumer perceptions often differ from LCA findings and revealed that, frequently, conventional plastics are not the least environmentally friendly choice. Bioplastics typically show benefits only in the climate change and the fossil resource depletion impact categories. The heavy weight of glass turns out to affect its environmental performances with respect to the light plastics, with reuse being an essential strategy to lower the burdens. The comparison between plastics and metals is more balanced, leaning more towards plastics for food packaging. Similarly, paper resulted often preferable than plastics. Finally, for the other materials (i.e. wood and textiles), the picture is variable. To be competitive with plastics, the alternative materials require improvements like the optimisation of their production processes, their reuse and enhanced end-of-life options. At the same time, recycled polymers could boost the eco-performance of virgin plastics.

More Papers Like This

Article

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Bioplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted life cycle assessments of multiple bioplastic types — including PLA, PHA, and starch-based polymers — finding that while bioplastics generally reduce fossil resource depletion compared to conventional plastics, their environmental benefits vary considerably depending on feedstock, production process, and end-of-life scenario.

Article

Life Cycle Analysis of Beverage Packaging

AI summary Read the abstract

This research characterized microplastic contamination in seawater and biota from a coastal marine protected area. Despite its protected status, the marine reserve showed microplastic contamination in surface water and in the tissues of resident fish and invertebrates, indicating that formal protection from fishing does not shield ecosystems from plastic pollution.

Article

Life Cycle Assessment Approach for Mitigating Problems of Plastic Waste Management

AI summary Read the abstract

This review applies Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to evaluate the environmental and health impacts of plastic products across their entire lifecycle from raw material extraction through disposal, demonstrating how LCA can identify opportunities for reducing plastic's environmental burden. The chapter highlights that recycling achieves less than 20% of used plastics and emphasizes LCA as a tool for comparing conventional plastics against sustainable bioplastics to guide more responsible material choices.

Article

Life cycle assessment of plastic waste and energy recovery

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated the vertical distribution of microplastics in open ocean water columns at stations across the North Atlantic, finding that particle concentrations were highest in subsurface waters rather than the surface mixed layer. Biofouling and association with marine snow were identified as mechanisms driving downward flux of buoyant polymers in the water column.

Article

Life cycle assessment of drinks packaging: are there environmentally-friendly alternatives to plastics?

AI summary Read the abstract

This life cycle assessment of beverage packaging compared glass, aluminum, PET, HDPE, milk cartons, and Tetra Pak containers across three drink categories, finding that 100% recycled aluminum cans, Tetra Pak, and milk cartons were less environmentally impactful than plastic bottles in their respective categories.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper