We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Toward more sustainable research: reducing the environmental impact when working with Drosophila
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examines plastic waste and greenhouse gas emissions from a UK Drosophila research facility, estimating roughly 4 tonnes of plastic-enriched clinical waste incinerated annually, and demonstrates that alternative container materials and waste management strategies could reduce plastic waste by up to 76% and greenhouse gas emissions by up to 80% over a decade.
The ever-increasing amounts of plastic waste and greenhouse gas emissions worldwide threaten our environment. Biomedical laboratories across the world generate serious amounts of plastic waste often disposed of via high-emission strategies. Achieving sustainability is imperative but requires awareness and knowledge of the regulations, available options, and their implications. To illustrate the thought processes involved, we showcase the Manchester Fly Facility which supports work with the genetic model organism Drosophila and serves 13 research groups. In 2022, we estimated ∼4 tonnes of "clinical" waste generation by the facility enriched with single-use polystyrene plastic containers, all frozen for 2 days and then incinerated. We calculate the resulting environmental and economic costs and compare them to practices reported to us from other fly facilities worldwide. We then discuss feasible management options, separately explaining alternative choices for (1) container materials, (2) the processing of genetically modified organisms, (3) re-use strategies, and (4) waste management procedures. This information hopefully raises awareness and understanding to incentivize laboratories worldwide to adopt more sustainable choices, as is permitted by their local infrastructure and regulations. To illustrate what can be achieved, we extrapolate the Manchester data from 2022 to a period of 10 years and calculate the impact of different management strategies, indicating that up to 80% of greenhouse gas emissions and 76% of plastic waste can be saved. The resulting economic savings are of further benefit and could be re-invested to pay for additional workforce, which may otherwise pose an important barrier to re-use scenarios in many countries.
More Papers Like This
From waste to resource: The untapped value of the separate collection of single-use laboratory plastics to enable recycling
AI summary Read the abstract
An audit of laboratory plastic waste found that 87% by weight was recyclable polymer, and a separate-collection scheme for polystyrene and polypropylene achieved 85% user acceptance while enabling high-quality monostream recycling. Laboratories generate an estimated 5.5 million tonnes of plastic waste annually, making this blueprint for lab plastic circularity directly relevant to reducing a significant and largely untracked source of plastic entering waste streams.
The effects of microplastics and nanoplastics upon history, policies, and Drosophila melanogaster
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examined the effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, finding that dietary exposure to these pervasive environmental contaminants causes measurable biological harm and making the case for stronger regulatory policies.
Effects of PET microplastics on the physiology of Drosophila
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used Drosophila fruit flies as a model to study the physiological effects of PET microplastics, finding that ingestion affected reproduction, lifespan, and gut function. The study suggests that even common plastic types found in food packaging can have measurable biological effects when consumed by living organisms.
Nanoplastics and Microplastics and Their Impact on Male Reproduction—Uncovering the Hidden Hazards Using the Drosophila Model
AI summary Read the abstract
Using Drosophila as a model organism, researchers investigated the impact of micro- and nanoplastics on male reproductive health, finding that exposure impaired reproductive output and sperm quality. The study validates Drosophila as an ethical, cost-effective model for assessing reproductive toxicity of microplastics.
PET microplastics as a Grand Challenge: Effects of PET Microplastics on Model Organisms and Exploring Detection and Degradation Strategies for Environmental Remediation
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines PET microplastics specifically, covering how detection methods have evolved, how PET particles disrupt locomotion and gut microbiota in Drosophila (fruit flies), and how chemical recycling via glycolysis or hydrolysis could depolymerize PET waste before it fragments into microplastics. The finding that PET MPs increased spontaneous activity in flies and harmed their gut-brain axis raises concerns because PET is one of the most common plastics in food and beverage packaging.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.