0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Anaerobic Digestate as a Soil Amendment: Impacts on Crop Production, Soil Ecology, and Environmental Quality. A Review

Preprints.org 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Benedict Twongyere

Summary

This review examines the agronomic and environmental variability of anaerobic digestate as a biofertilizer, noting that digestate inputs introduce microplastic contamination into agricultural soils and that careful characterization of digestate quality is needed before large-scale application.

Body Systems

The global push for a circular bioeconomy and renewable energy has led to a surge in anaerobic digestion (AD), generating vast quantities of digestate. This byproduct is increasingly positioned as a biofertilizer, yet its agronomic performance and environmental impacts are highly variable and not fully understood, particularly in comparison to traditional compost. While numerous studies have assessed the short-term fertilizing effect of digestate, a comprehensive synthesis that bridges its immediate agronomic performance with its long-term impacts on soil carbon sequestration, microbial ecology, and greenhouse gas fluxes remains elusive. Here we review over two decades of scientific literature (2000-2025) to provide a comprehensive analysis of digestate as a soil amendment. The major points are the following: 1) Digestate's high concentration of readily available nitrogen makes it a potent, fast-acting fertilizer, often producing crop yields equivalent or superior to mineral fertilizers. 2) This rapid nutrient release, however, creates a significant risk of environmental loss through ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching if not managed with precision, and can, under certain conditions, lead to higher nitrous oxide emissions than synthetic fertilizers. 3) The impact of digestate on long-term soil health, particularly physical properties, carbon sequestration, and the full soil food web, reveals a complex dilemma of short-term risks versus long-term benefits, with new evidence highlighting its potential for restoring degraded lands. 4) The feedstock is the primary determinant of digestate quality, influencing everything from nutrient ratios and carbon quality to contaminant loads. 5) Integrated approaches, such as co-composting, advanced digestate conditioning, and novel formulations with amendments like biochar, offer promising pathways to combine the energy benefits of AD with the soil-building properties of traditional amendments. This review provides a critical synthesis to guide the sustainable integration of digestate into modern agroecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Review Tier 2

Anaerobic Digestate as a Soil Amendment: Impacts on Crop Production, Soil Ecology, and Environmental Quality - A Review

This review examines the use of anaerobic digestate as a soil amendment, analyzing its variable agronomic performance and environmental impacts including microplastic contamination risks, finding that digestate quality and application conditions strongly determine its value as a biofertilizer.

Review Tier 2

Anaerobic Digestate as a Soil Amendment: Impacts on Crop Production, Soil Ecology, and Environmental Quality. A Review

This review examines the environmental impacts of applying anaerobic digestate to agricultural soils, including the introduction of microplastic contaminants from digested feedstocks, assessing how MP-laden digestate affects soil ecology, crop production, and long-term soil health.

Review Tier 2

Anaerobic Digestate as a Soil Amendment: Impacts on Crop Production, Soil Ecology, and Environmental Quality. A Review

This review synthesizes over two decades of research on using anaerobic digestate as a soil amendment, comparing its performance to traditional compost. The authors examine the agronomic benefits, effects on soil microbial communities, greenhouse gas emissions, and the risk of introducing contaminants including microplastics and heavy metals. The study highlights that while digestate can be an effective biofertilizer, its environmental safety depends heavily on feedstock quality and processing conditions.

Article Tier 2

Characteristics, limitations and global regulations in the use of biogas digestate as fertilizer: A comprehensive overview

This review examines the use of biogas digestate, the leftover material from biogas production, as agricultural fertilizer, highlighting both its benefits and risks. While digestate is rich in nutrients, it can contain contaminants including heavy metals, pathogens, and microplastics that may enter the food chain through treated crops. The authors review global regulations and call for stricter quality controls to prevent microplastic and other contaminant transfer to agricultural soils.

Article Tier 2

Digestate Quality Originating from Kitchen Waste

This review examines how plastic contaminants — including conventional microplastics and supposedly biodegradable bioplastics — affect the quality of digestate produced from kitchen waste in anaerobic digestion. Key findings are that most bioplastics do not reliably degrade in anaerobic conditions, that microplastics are difficult to identify and measure in food waste inputs, and that contaminated digestate applied to agricultural land becomes a vector for spreading microplastics into soil. The paper highlights a critical but overlooked gap between the promises of 'biodegradable' plastics and their real-world performance.

Share this paper