We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Dynamic responses of gut microbiota to agricultural and wildfire ash: insights from different amphibian developmental stages
Summary
Researchers studied how ash from wildfires and rice straw burning affects the gut bacteria and survival of frogs at different life stages. Wildfire ash significantly reduced tadpole survival and altered gut microbial communities differently than agricultural ash. The findings suggest that combustion byproducts in freshwater ecosystems may pose distinct risks to amphibians depending on the ash source and the animal's developmental stage.
Combustion by-products-specifically wildfire ash and rice-straw ash-are emerging contaminants in freshwater ecosystems. However, their impacts on amphibian survival and gut microbiota across various developmental stages remains largely unclear, thereby limiting evidence-based conservation strategies in fire-affected habitats. This study evaluated the effects of artificial water (control, C) and aqueous extracts of ash (AEAs) derived from wildfire ash (W) and rice straw ash (S) on the survival and gut (G) microbiota of Rana dybowskii tadpoles (T) and adult frogs (F). Exposure to wildfire ash significantly reduced tadpole survival compared to rice straw ash, whereas no significant differences were observed in adult frogs. Alpha diversity of the gut microbiota differed significantly among tadpole groups but not among adult groups. Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac analyses revealed significant differences in the gut microbiota of adult frogs and tadpoles across different treatment groups. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) identified a significant enrichment of specific bacterial genera across treatment groups. BugBase analysis indicated that in the TCG, TSG, and TWG groups, notable variations in the TCG, TSG, and TWG groups, there were notable differences in Forms-Biofilms and Potentially-Pathogenic, while in the FCG, FSG, and FWG groups, significant differences were observed in Aerobic, Gram-Positive, Potentially-Pathogenic, and Stress-Tolerant. These findings suggest that wildfire ash exhibits greater toxicity than rice straw ash to both life stages of R. dybowskii, with tadpoles being more vulnerable. By elucidating the link between ash-derived pollutants and amphibian gut health, this study underscores the growing threat of routine straw burning and intensifying wildfires to global freshwater biodiversity and advocates for ash-specific mitigation measures and microbiota-informed conservation strategies.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Differential effects of microplastic exposure on anuran tadpoles: A still underrated threat to amphibian conservation?
Researchers found that microplastic exposure affects amphibian tadpoles differently depending on the species, with Italian agile frog tadpoles showing reduced survival at high concentrations while green toad tadpoles were more resilient.
Impacts and transport of microplastics: Population dynamics in frogs and the transfer between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems
Researchers studied how microplastics affect the development and survival of Japanese tree frogs and how frogs may transport plastics from water to land. They found that microplastic exposure did not significantly alter hatching or survival rates but did affect growth patterns. The study also demonstrates that as frogs metamorphose and move onto land, they carry ingested microplastics with them, creating a previously underappreciated pathway for plastic pollution to spread between ecosystems.
Microplastic pollution and amphibian health: Complex physiological effects of different microplastic types on juvenile Glandirana rugosa
Researchers studied how polypropylene and polyethylene microplastics affect juvenile frogs and found significantly higher mortality rates in microplastic-exposed groups. The frogs showed elevated stress hormones, signs of oxidative damage, and elongated intestines, suggesting their bodies were trying to adapt to the particles. The study highlights that microplastics pose both physical and chemical risks to amphibians, which may contribute to population declines.
Life on both environment in semi-aquatic frogs: Impact of aquatic microplastic (MP) from MP enrichment to growth, immune function and physiological stress
Researchers exposed juvenile black-spotted pond frogs to different concentrations of microplastics in water to study effects after metamorphosis. They found that microplastics accumulated primarily in the digestive tract and caused reduced growth, increased stress markers, and weakened immune function at higher concentrations. The study suggests that microplastic pollution in freshwater habitats could pose significant health risks to amphibians during vulnerable life stages.
Ecotoxicological perspectives of microplastic pollution in amphibians
This review summarizes research on how microplastics affect amphibians, which are considered important indicator species for freshwater pollution. Researchers found evidence that microplastics can impair amphibian growth, immune function, and gene expression, with effects varying by species and particle characteristics. The findings raise concerns about the vulnerability of amphibian populations already threatened by habitat loss and other environmental stressors.