0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Large Scale Microplastic Fibre Analysis in Wastewater: A Comprehensive Review and Recommendations

Current Pollution Reports 2025 7 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 53 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
James V. Tarte, James V. Tarte, James V. Tarte, Mohammad Boshir Ahmed, James V. Tarte, Mohammad Boshir Ahmed, Md Abu Hasan Johir, Mohammad Boshir Ahmed, Van-Tung Tra, Qilin Wang Van-Tung Tra, Van-Tung Tra, Long D. Nghiem, Long D. Nghiem, Van-Tung Tra, Qilin Wang Qilin Wang Long D. Nghiem, Qilin Wang Qilin Wang Md Abu Hasan Johir, Md Abu Hasan Johir, Long D. Nghiem, Long D. Nghiem, Qilin Wang Qilin Wang Qilin Wang Qilin Wang Qilin Wang Qilin Wang Qilin Wang Qilin Wang Qilin Wang Qilin Wang

Summary

This review critically analyzes current and emerging methods for identifying and quantifying microplastic fibers in wastewater, covering sample collection, pretreatment, and analytical techniques. The authors note that there are currently no universally accepted standards for collecting and analyzing microplastic fibers specifically, and that most existing methods were designed for microplastics in general. The study provides recommendations for developing standardized large-scale fiber analysis protocols for wastewater monitoring.

Study Type Environmental

Abstract Purpose of Review This review provides a critical analysis of current and emerging methods for identifying and quantifying microplastic fibres (MPF) in wastewater, covering all key steps of sample collection, pretreatment, and analytical analysis. There are currently no universally accepted standards for collecting and analysing MPF. This review aims to provide new insights to develop appropriate processes for collecting and analysing MPF in wastewater through a critical analysis of the literature. Recent Findings Previous studies have used non-selective grab sampling and stacked sieving apparatuses to collect and/or sort microplastics, but very few have been specifically applied to MPF. Hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) digestion is the most widely used for sample preparation prior to MPF analysis. MPF quantification by manual counting under an optical microscope is possible but is inefficient and unable to meet the required level of accuracy. Either micro–Fourier Transport Infrared (µFTIR) or µ-Raman is suitable for polymer identification. They each have distinctive reported strengths and weaknesses, and µFTIR is more appropriate for MPF analysis. Summary Fast and scalable analysis can be achieved with grab sampling for collection, H 2 O 2 digestion for pretreatment, filtration using glass fibre or alumina oxide membranes, and then microscopic imaging with fluorene tagging for automated counting. Transmittance μFTIR is the most appropriate tool for polymer identification. Density separation, extensive sample digestion, manual counting, and Raman spectroscopy are not required or incompatible for MPF analysis.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper