We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Removal and reincorporation of microplastics at several stages of two seawater reverse osmosis plants that provide drinking water to Barcelona metropolitan area
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested two seawater desalination plants that supply drinking water to Barcelona and found they remove over 90% of microplastics from seawater, making the treatment process highly effective. Interestingly, one late-stage treatment step (called remineralization, which adds minerals back into the water) actually introduced small amounts of new microplastics, a finding that suggests plants should routinely check water quality at this stage. The good news: even with this minor addition, drinking water from desalination plants is not a major source of microplastic exposure compared to things like bottled water or seafood.
Desalination to produce drinking water has emerged as a vital strategy to address water scarcity, especially in the Mediterranean region. Present study evaluated the efficiency of microplastics (MPs) removal at each treatment unit of two seawater reverse osmosis plants (SWROPs) that receive seawater from the Mediterranean Sea and produce drinking water. Scientific information regarding the characterisation of MPs through the desalination of seawater is currently very scarce. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first investigation to quantify MPs levels and characteristics in the effluents of individual treatment stages of a regularly operated SWROP producing drinking water. SWROPs influent seawater showed different MPs concentrations (2294 vs. 414 MPs/m 3 ), however their effluents had similar levels of MPs (130 vs. 69 MPs/m 3 ). MPs removal rates of both SWROPs were high (94.3 and 83.3 %), especially if cellulosic materials are not taken into account (93.6 and 91.9 %). While the effluent of the reverse osmosis presented very low MPs levels and most MPs (>97 %) were removed from water, the remineralization step was identified as a source of MPs incorporation in the effluent of both plants, thus enhancing the need of performing a periodical quality control of this treatment stage. In any case, the intake of water from SWROPs effluents is not a relevant source of MPs exposure for humans compared with other potential pathways, such as the consumption of bottled water or the intake of seafood.
More Papers Like This
Microplastic in desalinated and seawater: Comparative assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared microplastic concentrations in desalinated and raw seawater in the Canary Islands, evaluating how well the desalination process reduces plastic particle contamination. Desalination removed a substantial fraction of microplastics but did not eliminate them entirely from drinking water.
Microplastics from headwaters to tap water: occurrence and removal in a drinking water treatment plant in Barcelona Metropolitan area (Catalonia, NE Spain)
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tracked microplastics through an entire drinking water treatment plant in Barcelona, from river source to tap. The study found microplastic concentrations of about 1 particle per liter in the raw intake water, with sand filtration removing roughly 78% of particles and the overall treatment process achieving 93% removal. Advanced treatments like ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis proved more effective at removing microplastics than conventional ozonation and carbon filtration.
Occurrence, characteristics, and removal of microplastics in conventional and seawater reverse osmosis drinking water treatment plants
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested tap water treatment plants in Iran and found that both regular water treatment and seawater desalination remove most tiny plastic particles (microplastics) from drinking water, about 76% to 87%, but don't eliminate them completely. Even after treatment, small amounts of plastic bits, mostly from packaging materials like PET and PP, still ended up in the water people drink, though at low enough levels that the estimated daily intake was very small. This matters because it shows current water treatment is fairly effective but not perfect, highlighting a need for better filtration technology to catch the plastics that slip through.
Microplastic in desalinated and seawater: Comparative assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared microplastic concentrations in desalinated water and seawater in the Canary Islands, where desalination supplies a significant portion of the drinking water. Microplastics were detected in both source seawater and desalinated water, with desalination providing partial but incomplete removal.
Microplastic removal across ten drinking water treatment facilities and distribution systems
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers characterized microplastic removal across ten drinking water treatment facilities and found that conventional municipal treatment achieved greater than 97.5% removal, primarily through granular media filtration or ultrafiltration. Untreated source waters contained between approximately 1,200 and 7,200 microplastic particles per liter, with polypropylene, polyethylene, and polyamide being the most common types. The findings provide valuable data on microplastic exposure through drinking water and the effectiveness of existing treatment processes.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.