0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Sign in to save

Control of Low-Density Microplastics in Wastewater Treatment Plants: The Effects of Process Configuration and Polymer Properties on Removal Efficiency

Frontiers in Plant Science 2026
Alessia Giannattasio, Mary Vermi Aizza Corpuz, Giuseppina Oliva, Veronica Iuliano, Domenico Giaquinto, Alfonso Grassi, Tiziano Zarra, Vincenzo Belgiorno, Antonio Buonerba, Vincenzo Naddeo

Summary

Two full-scale wastewater treatment plants achieved over 94% removal of polyethylene microplastics, but removal of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was far more variable due to its high hydrophobicity resisting adsorption to biomass. These findings reveal that certain low-density, hydrophobic polymers common in consumer products are poorly retained by conventional treatment, allowing them to pass into waterways.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

The growing concern over emerging contaminants in the urban water cycle has highlighted the role of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) as major pathways for their release into aquatic environments. The study investigates the fate of low-density microplastics (MPs) in two full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR, WWTP-A) and an activated sludge (AS) process coupled with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (MBR, WWTP-B). Polyethylene (PE) and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) were quantified through a mass-based analytical method using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy. These polymers are characterized by high prevalence in WWTPs influents and low-density characteristics, associated with their abundant presence in final effluents. Both plants exhibited high PE removal efficiencies, averaging 94.9 ± 1.0% in WWTP-A and 97.5 ± 3.5% in WWTP-B, confirming the effective retention of this polymer through WWTP processes. Conversely, PDMS removal resulted in more variable outcomes, with efficiencies of 67.4 ± 22.8% in WWTP-A and 87.8 ± 9.2% in WWTP-B. The lower PDMS removal was attributed to its high hydrophobicity and low surface energy, which hindered adsorption onto microbial biomass and extracellular polymeric substances. The results highlight the importance of design proper technologies for mitigating the discharge of highly hydrophobic polymers into aquatic environments.

Share this paper