We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Antagonistic Interaction Between Microplastics and Herbivory on the Growth of Native and Invasive Plants
Summary
This study tested the individual and combined effects of polyethylene microplastics and herbivory on native and invasive plants, finding an antagonistic interaction where herbivore damage and MP stress partially offset each other's growth effects, with implications for invasive plant management.
Microplastic pollution and herbivory are increasingly recognized as significant stressors in terrestrial ecosystems, yet their interactive effects on native and invasive plants remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the individual and combined effects of polyethylene microplastics (PE-MPs) and herbivory by Helicoverpa armigera on the growth and functional traits of twelve plant species (six invasive and six native). Exposure to PE-MPs significantly reduced biomass accumulation, with larger reductions in shoot, root, and total biomass for native plants than for invasive ones. Herbivory also significantly reduced biomass accumulation. When combined, PE-MPs and herbivory produced antagonistic effects on shoot, root, and total biomass. No significant three-way interaction was found among PE-MPs, herbivory, and plant status. Both PE-MPs and herbivory significantly reduced the root mass fraction and root-to-shoot ratio (RSR) while increasing the shoot mass fraction, with the PE-MP-induced reduction in RSR being stronger in native plants. Our findings suggest that multiple anthropogenic stressors can act as ecological filters, reshaping plant competitive dynamics and accelerating community shifts toward stress-tolerant species.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Effect of microplastics on the allelopathic effects of native and invasive plants on co-occurring invaders
Researchers found that polyethylene microplastics in soil enhanced the growth of both native and invasive plant species under competitive and non-competitive conditions. The microplastics also induced negative allelopathic effects from the native plant Achyranthes on neighboring plants, mediated through changes in leaf chemistry. The study suggests that microplastic pollution could alter competitive dynamics between native and invasive species by modifying plant chemical interactions.
Microplastics could alter invasive plant community performance and the dominance of Amaranthus palmeri
This study examined how microplastics interact with invasive and native plant species in mixed plant communities, finding that microplastics altered competitive dynamics and affected the dominance of the invasive species Amaranthus palmeri. The results suggest that microplastic pollution could modulate the outcomes of plant invasions.
Microplastics and cadmium affect invasion success by altering complementarity and selection effects in native community
Researchers tested how microplastics and cadmium individually and together affect invasive plant success in native plant communities of varying diversity. Microplastics alone reduced invasion success by up to 63% in high-diversity communities, while cadmium increased invasive plant biomass by 40%, but microplastics suppressed this cadmium-driven boost.
The effect of soil microplastics on Oryza sativa L. root growth traits under alien plant invasion
Researchers studied how microplastics in soil interact with an invasive weed species to affect rice root growth. Both stressors individually harmed rice roots, but their combination produced complex interactive effects that altered root architecture and nutrient uptake. This suggests that microplastic pollution in farmland may compound the damage caused by invasive plants, creating compounding threats to crop productivity.
Nanoplastics, but Not Microplastics, Enhance Plant Resistance to Herbivores Through Defence Priming
Researchers found that nanoplastics (100 nm), but not microplastics (2 µm), enhanced resistance of the wetland plant Phragmites australis to herbivore damage by priming plant defense mechanisms. The size-dependent difference suggests nanoplastics interact with plant signaling pathways in ways that microplastics do not.