We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Soil mineralogy and temperature modulate the effects of biodegradable microplastics on dissolved organic carbon in soils
Summary
Scientists tested how "biodegradable" plastic particles break down in different types of soil and found they can actually release more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than expected, especially in warmer temperatures. The plastic pieces also change the chemistry of soil in ways that could make it less healthy and stable over time. This matters because it suggests that biodegradable plastics may not be as environmentally friendly as we thought, and the tiny plastic particles could be affecting the soil that grows our food.
Biodegradable plastics are increasingly promoted as sustainable alternatives to conventional polymers, yet their degradation in soils can mobilize dissolved organic carbon (DOC), alter the stability of soil organic matter (SOM) and generate oligomers and nanoplastic particles with high bioavailability. The release of labile carbon forms from biodegradable microplastics can stimulate microbial activity, weaken mineral protection of organic matter, and enhance CO2 emissions, with effects becoming more pronounced under warmer pedoclimatic conditions. Despite their growing use, the extent to which biodegradable microplastics influence DOC dynamics and priming of native SOM across contrasting soil mineralogies remains poorly constrained. Here, we investigated how biodegradable microplastics affect SOM stability under warming by incubating two contrasting soils, a 2:1 clay-rich Chernozem and a highly weathered Ferralsol dominated by 1:1 clays and Fe/Al oxides, with two biodegradable polymers (polylactic acid, PLA and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate), PBAT) at 22 and 27 ºC. Soil CO2 emissions and priming of native SOM were quantified using stable carbon isotopes (13CO2) measured by cavity ring-down spectroscopy, while changes in DOC quantity and quality were assessed using DOC concentrations and specific ultraviolet absorbance indices (SUVA254, SUVA260, and SUVA280). PBAT induced substantially higher cumulative CO2 emissions than PLA, driven by strong positive priming effects, particularly in the Chernozem, where priming accounted for a large fraction of total CO2-C released at both temperatures. In contrast, PLA showed minor or negligible priming effects. In the Ferralsol, total DOC concentrations were largely unaffected by plastic type, but biodegradable microplastics, especially PLA at 27 ºC, significantly reduced SUVA indices, indicating shifts toward less aromatic and potentially less stable DOM. These contrasting responses reflect differences in mineral protection mechanisms and pH regimes between soils. The contrasting responses of the Chernozem and the Ferralsol demonstrate that soil mineral protection mechanisms fundamentally control how biodegradable microplastics influence soil carbon stability. In the Chernozem, where organic matter stabilization relies primarily on 2:1 clays, cation bridging, and aggregate occlusion under neutral to alkaline pH (7.79), PBAT strongly stimulated microbial activity, resulting in pronounced positive priming and substantial losses of native soil carbon. The absence of concurrent changes in SUVA indices indicates that this destabilization was driven mainly by biological activation of weakly protected carbon pools rather than by disruption of chemically stabilized organomineral associations. In contrast, the Ferralsol, dominated by Fe and Al oxides and characterized by acidic pH (3.98) and strong inner-sphere complexation, showed limited sensitivity in total DOC and CO2 fluxes but exhibited marked, temperature-dependent shifts in DOC quality, particularly under PLA at 27 ºC. Reductions in SUVA indices point to selective alterations in DOC composition, consistent with modified sorption–desorption equilibria or preferential microbial processing of aromatic fractions without large-scale carbon mobilization. These findings indicate that biodegradable microplastics destabilize SOM through distinct pathways depending on mineralogy, either by enhancing microbial priming where mineral protection is weaker, or reshaping DOC composition where physicochemical stabilization dominates, with temperature further modulating these processes.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics Generate Less Mineral Protection of Soil Carbon and More CO2 Emissions
Researchers investigated how dissolved organic matter released from microplastics affects soil carbon storage compared to natural organic matter. They found that microplastic-derived compounds are nearly eight times more easily consumed by soil microbes, leading to significantly higher carbon dioxide emissions and much less carbon being stored in soil minerals. The findings suggest that microplastic pollution in agricultural and natural soils may undermine the land's ability to store carbon and contribute to climate warming.
Do biodegradable microplastics cause soil inorganic carbon loss in calcareous soils?
Researchers tested whether biodegradable microplastics cause the loss of stored carbon from calcium-rich soils. They found that early on, these plastics can increase carbon dioxide release from soil minerals, but over longer periods they actually inhibit that release in most cases. The study suggests that the effects of biodegradable microplastics on soil carbon storage are time-dependent and linked to changes in soil pH and microbial activity.
Mineralisation and priming effects of a biodegradable plastic mulch film in soils: Influence of soil type, temperature and plastic particle size
Researchers investigated how biodegradable mulch film microplastics break down in different soil types, finding that mineralisation rates increased with higher temperatures and were strongly influenced by soil type, particle size, and their interactions. The study also found that these microplastics can trigger priming effects that accelerate the decomposition of existing soil organic matter, raising questions about the true environmental footprint of biodegradable alternatives.
Impact of Biodegradable Plastics on Soil Health: Influence of Global Warming and Vice Versa
This review examines how biodegradable plastics affect soil health and how rising global temperatures may accelerate their breakdown and alter their environmental impact. Researchers found that biodegradable plastic fragments can change soil structure, microbial communities, and nutrient cycling, with effects varying by plastic type and environmental conditions. The study highlights a feedback loop where warming speeds plastic degradation while the resulting microplastics may further influence soil carbon processes.
Unravelling the ecological ramifications of biodegradable microplastics in soil environment: A systematic review
Researchers reviewed 85 studies on biodegradable microplastics in soil, finding that when biodegradable plastics fail to fully break down they can disrupt soil structure, nutrient cycling, and microbial life in ways that depend heavily on concentration and plastic type. The review highlights that "biodegradable" plastics are not a simple fix for microplastic pollution in agricultural soils.