We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
All that glitters is litter? Ecological impacts of conventional versus biodegradable glitter in a freshwater habitat.
Summary
A mesocosm experiment compared the effects of conventional PET glitter versus biodegradable alternatives (including modified cellulose and mica) on freshwater ecosystems, finding no significant effect on biodiversity but a reduction in algae photosynthesis from conventional glitter. The results suggest biodegradable glitter alternatives may be less harmful, though the effects of both types at higher concentrations or over longer periods remain unclear.
Biodegradable plastics are becoming increasingly popular due to global concerns about plastic pollution. In this study, the impacts of glitter manufactured of conventional, non-biodegradable polyethylene terephthalate (PET) versus glitter of alternative materials (modified regenerated cellulose (MRC), mica or synthetic mica) on the biodiversity and ecosystem functioning of freshwater, lotic habitats were compared using a semi-natural mesocosm experiment. After 36 days, there was no effect of glitter on overall assemblage structure or diversity indices, however there was a two-fold increase in the abundance of New Zealand mud snails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) in response to MRC glitter. In addition, the root length of common duckweed (Lemna minor) and phytoplankton biomass (based on chlorophyll content) were significantly reduced by exposure to any type of glitter. On the contrary, the chlorophyll content in the sediment (indicating microphytobenthos biomass) was significantly greater in those exposed to synthetic mica glitter. Organic matter content of sediment did not differ amongst any of the treatments. However initially, on days 8 and 15, NO concentration in the control treatment were significantly greater than in all glitter treatments, but this observation disappeared over time. Overall, results indicate that both conventional and alternative glitters can cause ecological impacts in aquatic ecosystems.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Physical and chemical effects of conventional microplastic glitter versus alternative glitter particles on a freshwater plant (Lemnaceae: Lemna minor)
Researchers compared the physical and chemical effects of conventional plastic glitter versus alternative biodegradable glitter on the freshwater plant Lemna minor, finding that both types can alter plant physiology through their physical presence and chemical leachates.
Ecotoxicological Assessment of “Glitter” Leachates in Aquatic Ecosystems: An Integrated Approach
Leachates from nine types of commercial glitter were tested for toxicity in freshwater and saltwater model organisms across three soak periods up to 180 days. Photosynthesizing primary producers were most sensitive to glitter leachates, with some formulations causing significant growth inhibition, raising ecotoxicological concerns about this largely overlooked microplastic category.
Stealth microplastics pollutants: Toxicological evaluation of polyethylene terephthalate-based glitters on the microalga Desmodesmus sp. and its color effect
Researchers found that PET-based glitter microplastics and their chemical leachates are toxic to the microalga Desmodesmus, with toxicity varying by glitter color, highlighting glitter as an overlooked source of primary microplastic pollution.
Taking the sparkle off the sparkling time
This review examines glitter—tiny metallic-coated plastic particles used in cosmetics, crafts, and food decoration—as a largely overlooked source of microplastic pollution. Glitter particles are difficult to filter from wastewater and persist in aquatic environments, posing ecological risks similar to other microplastics.
Metal and metalloid content, bioavailability and sorption processes in glitter and raw glitter materials and associations with human and ecological risk concerns.
Researchers analyzed metal and metalloid content in glitter particles and raw glitter materials, finding elevated concentrations of several potentially toxic elements, and assessed the human and ecological risk associated with glitter as a widespread microplastic contaminant in aquatic environments.