We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparisons between ingestion, rejection, and egestion of microbeads by burrowing clams, Meretrix meretrix and Paphia undulata: Implications for health risk of shellfish consumption.
Summary
Researchers compared microplastic ingestion, pseudofaeces rejection, and egestion in two burrowing clam species and found that the clams ingested more microbeads than they rejected. Larger microbeads were more likely to be rejected before ingestion, while smaller ones were more readily taken up, with implications for predicting plastic accumulation in bivalve-based foods.
Two burrowing clam species, namely Meretrix meretrix and Paphia undulata, were offered two sizes (small: 45-53 μm, and large: 106-125 μm) of fluorescent red polyethylene microbeads, and the ingestion (number of MPs in the body tissue and faeces) and rejection (number of MPs in pseudofaeces) of MPs investigated. Overall, MP beads ingested were 36 % more than those rejected. There was also a significant interaction between the size and fate of MPs. For both species, significantly more small beads were ingested than rejected, but there was no difference for the large beads. P. undulata ingested more MPs than M. meretrix and both species could depurate all the ingested MPs in 72 h, although a longer time was needed for the former species. The results can provide guidance on seafood selection and pre-treatment to minimize the number of MPs ingested by humans.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastic removal by Red Sea giant clam (Tridacna maxima)
Giant clams from the Red Sea were exposed to polyethylene microbeads across two size classes for 12 days, with clams actively retaining an average of ~7.55 beads/individual/day and shells serving as an additional sink for adhered particles. The study is the first to quantify microplastic ingestion by giant clams and identifies both digestive tissue and shell structure as retention sites.
Microplastic ingestion reduces energy intake in the clam Atactodea striata
Researchers found that microplastic ingestion by the clam Atactodea striata reduced clearance rate — and therefore energy intake — particularly at high concentrations, while respiration rate and absorption efficiency remained unchanged, with pseudofaeces and depuration limiting the amount of plastic retained in body tissue.
Habitual feeding patterns impact polystyrene microplastic abundance and potential toxicity in edible benthic mollusks
This study examined how different feeding strategies in edible mollusks affect how many microplastics they accumulate and how toxic the effects are. Researchers found that deposit-feeding snails and filter-feeding clams accumulated microplastics differently, with distinct impacts on digestive enzymes, oxidative stress, and neurotoxicity markers. The findings suggest that a shellfish species' feeding behavior directly influences the microplastic contamination risk for both the animal and human consumers.
Uptake, Elimination and Effects of Cosmetic Microbeads on the Freshwater Gastropod Biomphalaria glabrata
Researchers investigated uptake, elimination, and effects of cosmetic polyethylene microbeads on freshwater snails, finding that snails readily ingested and eliminated microbeads but showed limited adverse effects during short-term and long-term exposure periods.
Are microplastics impacting shellfish?
Researchers investigated whether microplastic contamination measurably impacts shellfish physiology, growth, reproduction, and health outcomes, assessing the ecological and food safety implications of microplastic exposure in commercially and ecologically important bivalve species.