0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Do digestates produced by co-digestion of biowaste and biodegradable plastic affect soil and aquatic organisms?

AI summary Read the abstract

This first multi-species ecotoxicological study assessed the effects of digestates from co-digestion of biowaste and biodegradable plastics on both soil and aquatic organisms. Digestate application posed variable risks depending on plastic type and organism tested, raising concerns about the safety of biodegradable plastic inclusion in biogas feedstocks.

The fast development of the biogas sector requires a better understanding of potential ecotoxicological effects of digestates on both terrestrial (through digestate spreading) and aquatic organisms (through digestate soil leachate). This study is the first one to assess through a multi-species approach that include aquatic organisms short-term ecotoxicological effect in microcosm experiments of digestates (and their respective leachates) derived from biowastes co-digested or not with biodegradable plastics (PLA or PHB). Ecotoxicological tests were performed on six terrestrial/aquatic bioindicators: (1) wheat, (2) tomato, (3) soil bacteria, (4) earthworm, (5) duckweed and (6) water flea. Digestate fertilization treatments were compared to a soil not fertilized and to a mineral fertilization ensuring the same level of N (170 kg N/ha) and P (17 kg P/ha) for all fertilized treatments. No ecotoxicities of all digestates and their soil leachates were observed on wheat, soil bacteria, earthworm, duckweed and water flea following laboratory standardized procedures. Attention should be given to possible ecotoxicity of biowaste digestates (with or without biodegradable plastics) on tomato growth where a lower dry aerial biomass (23 % less in average) was observed compared to the soil chemically fertilized. For all bioindicators, no differences were observed when comparing fertilization with biowaste digestate to its equivalent co-digested with biodegradable plastics. Therefore, no apparent ecotoxicity related to the potential presence of residual biodegradable plastics in digestates was highlighted. Long-term ecotoxicological effects and repeated exposure to biodegradable plastics from digestates as well as comparison with conventional plastics are beyond the scope of this article and will require further research.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Response of earthworms to microplastics in soil under biogas slurry irrigation: Toxicity comparison of conventional and biodegradable microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the toxicity of biodegradable polylactic acid and conventional polyvinyl chloride and polyethylene microplastics to earthworms in soil irrigated with biogas slurry. They found that all microplastic types caused time-dependent toxicity, including tissue damage, oxidative stress, and disruption of antioxidant defense systems at higher concentrations. The study suggests that biodegradable microplastics may pose similar ecological risks to conventional plastics for soil organisms.

Article Tier 2

A progress update on the biological effects of biodegradable microplastics on soil and ocean environment: A perfect substitute or new threat?

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines whether biodegradable plastics, often marketed as eco-friendly alternatives, actually break down safely in the environment. The evidence shows that biodegradable plastics often fragment into microplastics rather than fully decomposing, and these biodegradable microplastics can harm soil organisms, marine life, and disrupt nutrient cycles. The findings suggest that simply switching to biodegradable plastics may not solve the microplastic pollution problem and could introduce new environmental risks.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics and impurities in digestates and compost: A comparative study of waste-derived soil amendments

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers analyzed five types of compost and digestate from organic waste treatment facilities over three months, finding microplastics in all samples at concentrations comprising 30–65% of total plastic content, with fibers, films, and fragments of polyethylene, polypropylene, and PET being most common — highlighting how even properly managed biowaste streams can introduce plastics into agricultural soils.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Unravelling the ecological ramifications of biodegradable microplastics in soil environment: A systematic review

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed 85 studies on biodegradable microplastics in soil, finding that when biodegradable plastics fail to fully break down they can disrupt soil structure, nutrient cycling, and microbial life in ways that depend heavily on concentration and plastic type. The review highlights that "biodegradable" plastics are not a simple fix for microplastic pollution in agricultural soils.

Article Tier 2

Ecotoxicological insights into biodegradable and compostable plastic bags in freshwater systems: hidden environmental risks of a green alternative

AI summary Read the abstract

A review of ecotoxicological studies on biodegradable and compostable plastic bags in freshwater systems found that these materials can fragment into micro/nanoplastics faster than conventional plastics, leach toxic additives, and persist in aquatic environments despite their 'green' labeling. The evidence suggests that biodegradable plastics may not meaningfully reduce microplastic pollution risks and could introduce novel hazards, calling for more rigorous biodegradability standards and ecological risk assessment before widespread adoption.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper