0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Microplastic pollution in a philippine protected area: evidence from Siargao Island’s surface waters and Siganus spp.

Water Science 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Shaliemar Bajan, Erica Castillon, Sheena Tiffany Lagura, Florilyn Malaga, Georgie Rose Sales, Lovely Tulang, Jerry T. Cuadrado

Summary

Scientists found tiny plastic pieces in ocean waters and fish around a protected island in the Philippines, with nearly 80% of fish containing plastic particles in their stomachs. These microscopic plastics can move up the food chain when people eat contaminated fish, potentially affecting human health. The study shows that even protected ocean areas aren't safe from plastic pollution, highlighting the need for better waste management and reduced plastic use.

Body Systems

The Philippines is recognized as a major contributor to global marine plastic pollution; however, information on microplastic contamination within protected coastal ecosystems remains limited. This study assessed the occurrence of microplastics in surface waters and in two rabbitfish species, Siganus fuscescens and Siganus guttatus, from selected coastal sites within the Siargao Island Protected Landscape and Seascape. Surface water samples (20 L per station) and fish specimens (S. fuscescens, n = 80; S. guttatus, n = 22) were collected and examined. Microplastics in both water samples and fish gastrointestinal tracts were extracted using alkaline digestion followed by density separation. Water samples collected from six stations revealed an average concentration of 1000 particles/m3. Most were fibers (95%) and black in color (32%), ranging from 0.01 to 0.10 mm size (26%). The Kruskal–Wallis’s test indicated significant difference in microplastic abundance across sampling stations (p = 0.01185). Additionally, 80 (78.43%) out of 102 examined fish samples contained microplastics. S. fuscescens contained an average of 3.32 particles individual⁻1, while S. guttatus contained 2.76 particles individual⁻1, with a higher frequency of occurrence observed in S. guttatus (95.45%). Microplastics found on the studied fish species were mostly fibers (98.4%), black in color (38%), and in the 0.11–0.20 mm size range (34.65%). It was also noted that with increasing microplastic size, the numbers found in the gastrointestinal tract of the examined fish species decreases significantly. While there was no significant difference in microplastic abundance between species (p = 0.48585), notable differences were observed across sampling sites for S. fuscescens (p = 0.02848). These findings highlight the need for expanded microplastic research in other areas of Siargao, particularly in assessing the potential environmental and health impacts. There is also a need to conduct several measures such as promoting proper waste disposal, reduce plastic consumption, increase public awareness, and encourage innovative solutions to mitigate plastic contamination on the island.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Assessing the Educational Significance of Microplastic Impact on Sardinella gibbosa: Implications for Marine Sustainability and Public Health in Caraga Region, Philippines

Scientists found that 3 out of 4 fish (75%) caught off the coast of the Philippines had eaten tiny plastic pieces called microplastics, mostly plastic fibers from things like old fishing nets. This matters because people who eat these contaminated fish might also be consuming microplastics, though more research is needed to understand the health risks. The study shows how widespread plastic pollution has become in our oceans and food chain.

Article Tier 2

The presence of microplastics in fishes of South Maldives

Researchers found microplastics in the gut, gills, and flesh of two fish species collected from South Maldives, with 80% of one species containing plastic particles, indicating widespread ingestion by reef fish in this remote island nation and potential transfer into the human food chain.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic pollution in edible marine fish from the northwestern Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh: A comprehensive assessment of occurrence, characteristics and associated ecological risks

Scientists found tiny plastic pieces in the stomachs of all fish species they tested from waters near Bangladesh, with each fish containing about 7 plastic particles on average. Since people eat these fish, this means microplastics are likely getting into our food chain, though more research is needed to understand what health risks this might pose. The study shows that plastic pollution has spread throughout marine ecosystems and is now a common part of seafood we consume.

Article Tier 2

The influences of spatial-temporal variability and ecological drivers on microplastic in marine fish in Hong Kong

Researchers found that over 57% of marine fish in Hong Kong waters contained microplastics, with higher abundance in fish from more polluted western waters during the wet season, and that omnivorous fish ingested significantly more microplastics than carnivorous fish regardless of collection location or season.

Article Tier 2

Ingestion of plastic by fish destined for human consumption in remote South Pacific Islands

Plastic was found in the digestive tracts of 24 fish species collected from local fishermen and markets across remote South Pacific islands, with species consuming plastic regardless of feeding guild. The results raise public health concerns for Pacific island communities where fish is a dietary staple and plastic marine debris is widespread.

Share this paper