We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Quality Assessment of Methodological Aspects in Microplastics Studies on Processed Food
Summary
Researchers assessed the quality of methodological approaches used in 65 studies examining microplastics in processed food, published between 2015 and 2025. They found that many studies lacked adequate quality assurance procedures, with 49 out of 65 scoring zero for positive controls and laboratory preparation receiving the lowest scores overall. The study highlights the need for stricter standardized protocols to ensure reliable and comparable microplastic data in food safety research.
Interest in the presence of microplastics in processed food continues to grow, yet studies focusing on the methodological aspects, as well as quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) procedures, remain limited. Thus, this study focuses on the assessment of methodological aspects employed in microplastics in processed food studies using the Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Ecotoxicity Data framework. A total of 65 processed food studies conducted between 2015 and 2025 were selected for this assessment. This assessment involved 14 criteria, categorized into three phases: pre-laboratory work, laboratory work, and post-laboratory work. One study achieved the highest score of 27 out of 28, with the average total score ranging from 20 to 24. The lowest overall score was 8. In the pre-laboratory work, the most frequently reported aspect was sample size. During the laboratory work, laboratory preparation received the lowest score of 2, and 49 studies scored 0 for positive controls. In the post-laboratory work, most studies provided particle characteristics; however, for polymer color, 16 studies received a score of 0. The steps taken in pre-laboratory and laboratory work directly impact the accuracy and validity of the data in the post-laboratory work. These scores further reflect the need for stricter QA and QC standards related to the methodological aspects. Future studies can use the current assessment of methodological aspects as a reference to obtain reliable and valid microplastic data, which will increase confidence in their use in toxicity assessments.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: Critical review and assessment of data quality
Researchers critically reviewed fifty studies on microplastics in freshwater and drinking water and found significant quality issues, including inconsistent sampling methods and inadequate contamination controls. Many studies lacked proper quality assurance, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions about actual contamination levels. The study emphasizes that standardized methods are urgently needed before the true extent of microplastic contamination in drinking water can be assessed.
Quality Criteria for Microplastic Effect Studies in the Context of Risk Assessment: A Critical Review
Researchers developed 20 quality criteria to evaluate 105 published studies on the biological effects of microplastics and found that, on average, studies met less than half the quality benchmarks. No single study scored positively on all criteria, confirming an urgent need for better experimental standards in the field. The review highlights that the most critical improvements needed involve verifying background contamination and using environmentally realistic exposure conditions.
Microplastics in food - a critical approach to definition, sample preparation, and characterisation
This review critically examines how microplastics in food are defined, extracted, and analyzed across different studies, finding significant inconsistencies that make it hard to compare results. The lack of standardized methods for isolating and identifying microplastics in food means that contamination levels may be over- or underestimated. The authors call for unified research methods to enable credible assessments of how dietary microplastic exposure affects health.
Assessment of quality control measures in the monitoring of microplastic: a critical review
Researchers conducted a critical review of quality control measures used in microplastic monitoring studies, evaluating eight key quality control parameters across 30 published studies. The review found that strict quality control protocols are essential for accurate microplastic detection, as small-sized particles and microfibers can easily be introduced as contaminants from ambient air, sampling equipment, and laboratory environments during the monitoring process.
Advancing the quality of environmental microplastic research
This review examines the rapidly growing field of environmental microplastic research, discussing the methodological inconsistencies that limit comparability across studies and calling for improved quality standards to support robust regulatory and scientific conclusions.