0
Article Tier 2 Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Quality Assessment of Methodological Aspects in Microplastics Studies on Processed Food

Journal of Analytical Chemistry 2025 1 citation

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers assessed the quality of methodological approaches used in 65 studies examining microplastics in processed food, published between 2015 and 2025. They found that many studies lacked adequate quality assurance procedures, with 49 out of 65 scoring zero for positive controls and laboratory preparation receiving the lowest scores overall. The study highlights the need for stricter standardized protocols to ensure reliable and comparable microplastic data in food safety research.

Interest in the presence of microplastics in processed food continues to grow, yet studies focusing on the methodological aspects, as well as quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) procedures, remain limited. Thus, this study focuses on the assessment of methodological aspects employed in microplastics in processed food studies using the Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Ecotoxicity Data framework. A total of 65 processed food studies conducted between 2015 and 2025 were selected for this assessment. This assessment involved 14 criteria, categorized into three phases: pre-laboratory work, laboratory work, and post-laboratory work. One study achieved the highest score of 27 out of 28, with the average total score ranging from 20 to 24. The lowest overall score was 8. In the pre-laboratory work, the most frequently reported aspect was sample size. During the laboratory work, laboratory preparation received the lowest score of 2, and 49 studies scored 0 for positive controls. In the post-laboratory work, most studies provided particle characteristics; however, for polymer color, 16 studies received a score of 0. The steps taken in pre-laboratory and laboratory work directly impact the accuracy and validity of the data in the post-laboratory work. These scores further reflect the need for stricter QA and QC standards related to the methodological aspects. Future studies can use the current assessment of methodological aspects as a reference to obtain reliable and valid microplastic data, which will increase confidence in their use in toxicity assessments.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: Critical review and assessment of data quality

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers critically reviewed fifty studies on microplastics in freshwater and drinking water and found significant quality issues, including inconsistent sampling methods and inadequate contamination controls. Many studies lacked proper quality assurance, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions about actual contamination levels. The study emphasizes that standardized methods are urgently needed before the true extent of microplastic contamination in drinking water can be assessed.

Review Tier 2

Quality Criteria for Microplastic Effect Studies in the Context of Risk Assessment: A Critical Review

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed 20 quality criteria to evaluate 105 published studies on the biological effects of microplastics and found that, on average, studies met less than half the quality benchmarks. No single study scored positively on all criteria, confirming an urgent need for better experimental standards in the field. The review highlights that the most critical improvements needed involve verifying background contamination and using environmentally realistic exposure conditions.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in food - a critical approach to definition, sample preparation, and characterisation

AI summary Read the abstract

This review critically examines how microplastics in food are defined, extracted, and analyzed across different studies, finding significant inconsistencies that make it hard to compare results. The lack of standardized methods for isolating and identifying microplastics in food means that contamination levels may be over- or underestimated. The authors call for unified research methods to enable credible assessments of how dietary microplastic exposure affects health.

Article Tier 2

Interlaboratory Comparison Reveals State of the Art in Microplastic Detection and Quantification Methods

AI summary Read the abstract

An 84-laboratory interlaboratory comparison tested the accuracy of five established microplastic detection methods using standardized reference materials, revealing significant variability in results across labs and methods. The study highlights that standardization and harmonization of analytical procedures are urgently needed before microplastic measurement can be reliably compared across research groups.

Article Tier 2

A large-scale AI-assisted QA/QC analysis of microplastic data across human exposure pathways

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used an AI tool to check the quality of 950 studies on microplastics in air, food, and drinks. Most studies had major gaps, scoring only 12 out of 26 possible quality points, with food and air studies often not reflecting real human exposure. The analysis offers a ranking of which studies are most reliable for future health assessments.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper