0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Determination of the gut retention of plastic microbeads and microfibers in goldfish (Carassius auratus)

Chemosphere 2016 312 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Stefan Grigorakis, Sherri A. Mason, Ken G. Drouillard

Summary

Goldfish fed microbeads and microfibers from consumer products retained the fibers in their guts far longer than the smooth spherical beads, which were quickly egested. The findings suggest that fiber-shaped microplastics pose a greater retention risk than bead-shaped particles, with potential implications for toxicity and tissue accumulation in fish.

Microplastics are ubiquitous pollutants in aquatic habitats and commonly found in the gut contents of fish yet relatively little is known about the retention of these particles by fish. In this study, goldfish were fed a commercial fish food pellet amended with 50 particles of one of two microplastics types, microbeads and microfibers. Microbeads were obtained from a commercial facial cleanser while microfibers were obtained from washed synthetic textile. Following consumption of the amended pellet, fish were allowed to feed to satiation on non-amended food followed by fasting for periods ranging from 1.5 h to 6 days. Fish sacrificed at different time points were dissected to remove gut contents and the digesta contents retention and microplastic retention was determined. Although a small number of microplastic particles were retained in fish GI-tracts after 6 days (0-3 particles/50), the retention of microplastics was generally similar to the retention of bulk digesta contents. According to a breakpoint regression model fitted to digesta contents and microplastic particles, the 50% and 90% evacuation times were 10 h and 33.4 h, respectively. The results of this study indicate that neither microbeads nor microfibers are likely to accumulate within the gut contents of fish over successive meals.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Effects of virgin microplastics on goldfish (Carassius auratus)

Researchers fed goldfish three types of virgin microplastics — fibers, fragments, and pellets — for six weeks and observed significant weight loss, changes in gut tissue, and fiber accumulation in gills. The study suggests that different microplastic shapes cause different sub-lethal effects, with fibers appearing to be particularly problematic due to their tendency to entangle in tissues.

Article Tier 2

Effects of microfiber and bead microplastic exposure in the goldfish Carassius auratus: Bioaccumulation, antioxidant responses, and cell damage

Researchers exposed goldfish to two types of microplastics, fibers and beads, and found that both caused oxidative stress in the liver and kidney, with fiber-type microplastics generally producing stronger effects. The microplastics accumulated in fish tissues and triggered changes in antioxidant gene expression and cell damage over the five-day exposure period. The findings suggest that the shape of microplastics matters for their biological impact, with fibers potentially being more harmful than beads.

Article Tier 2

Accumulation of different shapes of microplastics initiates intestinal injury and gut microbiota dysbiosis in the gut of zebrafish

Researchers exposed zebrafish to three different shapes of microplastics and found that fibers and fragments accumulated more in the gut than beads, causing greater intestinal injury and disruption of gut bacteria. The shape of the microplastic particles significantly influenced both how much accumulated and the severity of the biological harm. The study suggests that microplastic shape is an important factor in assessing their environmental and health risks.

Article Tier 2

Ingestion and egestion of polyethylene microplastics by goldfish (Carassius auratus): influence of color and morphological features

Researchers studied how goldfish ingest and expel polyethylene microplastics of different colors, shapes, and sizes. They found that fish ingested more green and black particles than other colors, preferred film-shaped plastics over fragments, and rejected particles larger than 2 mm. Most ingested microplastics were expelled within 72 hours, though filament-shaped plastics took the longest to pass through.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic evacuation in fish is particle size‐dependent

Microplastic retention time in fish was found to depend on particle size, with larger particles being evacuated more slowly than smaller ones, providing empirical data to interpret gut burden studies and better understand chronic exposure dynamics.

Share this paper