0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Microbeads in Commercial Facial Cleansers: Threatening the Environment

CLEAN - Soil Air Water 2017 58 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Javier Bayo, Andrés Martínez, Marta Guillén, Sonia Olmos, María‐José Roca, Alberto Alcolea

Summary

Researchers extracted and analyzed microbeads from four commercial facial cleansers, finding concentrations high enough to raise concerns about environmental release through wastewater. The study adds to the evidence that personal care products are a significant and preventable source of primary microplastics entering aquatic ecosystems.

Polymers

The presence of primary microplastics in the environment isconsidered a major concern because of three main reasons: the physical damage to organisms that ingest them, the leaching of constituent contaminants such as monomers or additives, and the sorption of inorganic and organic chemicals. Microbeads collected from four facial cleansers, a personal care product commonly used by European consumers, have been analyzed in this paper. The variability in size distribution, specific surface area, the oxidation state of the polymer and the presence of whitening agents in one of the cosmetic formulations proved to be related with the ability to sorb heavy metals and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), both in bi‐distilled water and treated urban effluents. The sorption process for heavy metals proved to be related to a physical mechanism, without a specific interaction between the adsorbate and the microbead. In the case of PCBs, low molecular weight congeners proved to be preferentially sorbed by oxidized polyethylene (Microbead‐B, MB‐B), although the maximum amount for total PCBs sorption was for the facial cleanser with TiO 2 in its composition (Microbead‐A, MB‐A) and a moderate ecotoxicity. Regression models developed for PCBs showed a similar behavior of these pollutants in bi‐distilled and real treated urban effluents for microbeads, indicating that the exposed surface area was not the only mechanism responsible for sorption, but also the specific partitioning into the bulk microplastic.

Share this paper