0
Article Tier 2 Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Are We Underestimating Microplastic Contamination in Aquatic Environments?

Environmental Management 2017 277 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This review argues that current microplastic monitoring methods likely underestimate the true extent of contamination in aquatic environments, especially for small particles and fibers. The authors call for standardized, more sensitive detection methods to better inform regulation and risk assessment.

Polymers

Plastic debris, specifically microplastic in the aquatic environment, is an escalating environmental crisis. Efforts at national scales to reduce or ban microplastics in personal care products are starting to pay off, but this will not affect those materials already in the environment or those that result from unregulated products and materials. To better inform future microplastic research and mitigation efforts this study (1) evaluates methods currently used to quantify microplastics in the environment and (2) characterizes the concentration and size distribution of microplastics in a variety of products. In this study, 50 published aquatic surveys were reviewed and they demonstrated that most (~80%) only account for plastics ≥ 300 μm in diameter. In addition, we surveyed 770 personal care products to determine the occurrence, concentration and size distribution of polyethylene microbeads. Particle concentrations ranged from 1.9 to 71.9 mg g of product or 1649 to 31,266 particles g of product. The large majority ( > 95%) of particles in products surveyed were less than the 300 μm minimum diameter, indicating that previous environmental surveys could be underestimating microplastic contamination. To account for smaller particles as well as microfibers from synthetic textiles, we strongly recommend that future surveys consider methods that materials < 300 μm in diameter.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Review of "Are We Underestimating Microplastic Contamination in Aquatic Environments?"

AI summary Read the abstract

This entry describes a peer review record-keeping service for a study on whether current methods systematically underestimate how much microplastic contamination exists in aquatic environments — a concern that would mean pollution levels are worse than currently reported.

Article Tier 2

Updated review on microplastics in water, their occurrence, detection, measurement, environmental pollution, and the need for regulatory standards

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines microplastic occurrence, detection methods, and measurement techniques in aquatic environments, highlighting the urgent need for explicit regulatory frameworks to address the growing threat of microplastic pollution in water systems.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Aquatic Systems – Monitoring Methods and Biological Consequences

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed the current state of microplastic monitoring methods and their biological effects in aquatic systems, noting that most studies have focused on measuring how much plastic is present rather than understanding its harm to organisms. They emphasize the urgent need for standardized protocols so that results from different studies can be meaningfully compared.

Article Tier 2

A review of methods for measuring microplastics in aquatic environments

AI summary Read the abstract

This review critically evaluates methods used to measure microplastics in aquatic environments, covering sampling design, sample processing, and spectroscopic identification, and identifies the most significant sources of methodological variation. Standardizing these methods is essential for generating comparable data across studies and enabling robust environmental risk assessment.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics: Detection and impacts in aquatic environments – A review

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examined nanoplastic detection methods and their impacts in aquatic environments, concluding that current analytical capabilities severely underestimate nanoplastic exposure levels due to the difficulty of detecting sub-micron particles. The authors called for standardized nanoplastic detection protocols to enable meaningful risk assessment.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper