0
Article Tier 2 Remediation Sign in to save

The Influence of Sand and Cloth Tertiary Filtration on Microplastic Debris

Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America 2018 1 citation

AI summary Read the abstract

Tertiary filtration at wastewater treatment plants—using sand or cloth filters—was tested at five Illinois facilities and found to significantly reduce microplastic concentrations in effluent, with cloth filtration outperforming sand filtration for finer particles. Since wastewater effluent is a major pathway for microplastics to enter rivers and streams, upgrading treatment plants with effective tertiary filtration could substantially reduce environmental contamination.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic debris is ubiquitous in nature and can have adverse effects on marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Microplastic particles have many anthropogenic sources, and a common pathway for microplastics to enter the environment is through residential wastewater. Wastewater must be treated at Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP’s) through a series of primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment processes. Although tertiary treatment is not required, many WWTP’s incorporate processes like sand and cloth filtration in order to meet federal EPA effluent water standards. How well do sand and cloth tertiary filtration methods reduce microplastics in our wastewater effluent has not been determined. We examined the influence of tertiary treatment on microplastic concentrations at three different urban areas in central Illinois, USA. These five WWTPs served populations ranging from 3200 to 100,000 and had either sand, cloth or no filtration. We hypothesized that cloth filtration would reduce microplastic debris the most compared to sand and no filtration. We collected microplastics using a 333μm plankton net before and after tertiary filtration and processed the samples according to established protocols. Samples were also collected within the streams where effluent was discharged into. Microplastic particles were counted (fibers, beads, fragments) to determine what filtration methods are ideal for microplastic reduction. Results from this study shed light on how well tertiary filtration methods can reduce incoming microplastic loads in wastewater. We found microplastic concentrations to range from .73 particles/m 3 to 4.87 particles/m 3 in WWTP effluent. These concentrations are similar to/higher than what has been found for other WWTP effluent studies. A combination of combined sewage flows into some of the WWTP’s could account for some of the higher microplastic loads. Cloth filtration did not reduce microplastics as much as initially thought. We have seen up to 85% reduction of microplastics from pre-treated waters, but also seen an increase in microplastic debris post cloth filtration. Sand filtration has reduced up to 83% of microplastic debris. Without a reduction of plastic products, our environment and biological communities will be seriously threatened as a result of our disposable lifestyle.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Effects of Sand Filters in Wastewater Treatment Plants on Microplastic Output

AI summary Read the abstract

Sand filters in wastewater treatment plants reduced the mass of microplastics in effluent but increased the count of smaller particles, suggesting filtration fragments larger pieces rather than eliminating microplastics entirely. This finding indicates that conventional sand filtration is insufficient for microplastic removal and may inadvertently increase the release of smaller, potentially more bioavailable particles into freshwater streams.

Article Tier 2

The Efficacy of Polypropylene Glazed Felt as a Filtration Medium for Microplastics and Nanoplastics.

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated polypropylene glazed felt as a low-cost filtration medium for removing microplastics and nanoplastics from water, examining how fiber structure and surface properties influence capture efficiency across a range of particle sizes.

Article Tier 2

Developing a Reliable Method for Separating Microplastics from a Variety of Beach Sediments

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested and refined a method for separating microplastics from beach sediments using dry sieving combined with density separation, finding that treating different sediment size fractions separately improved recovery and reduced filter clogging, making it easier to detect microplastics across a wide range of particle sizes.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Trapping Efficiency Within a Low-cost Sediment Trap

AI summary Read the abstract

A low-cost sediment trap deployed in fluvial systems captured approximately 25% of introduced microplastics across varied particle types and flow rates, with capture efficiency varying significantly by particle size and shape. The results provide a baseline for designing affordable, scalable tools to monitor and potentially remediate microplastic pollution in rivers and creeks.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics—A Review of Sources, Separation, Analysis and Removal Strategies

AI summary Read the abstract

A comprehensive review of microplastic sources, analytical separation techniques, and removal strategies found that plastics enter both aquatic and terrestrial environments through diverse pathways, with no single removal approach currently capable of addressing the full scope of contamination. Developing integrated detection-to-removal pipelines is essential for reducing the environmental load and limiting ongoing human and wildlife exposure.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper