0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Microplastic Trapping Efficiency Within a Low-cost Sediment Trap

Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America 2022
Cole Bowman, Kelly Best Lazar, Elizabeth R. Carraway, Stefanie L. Whitmire

Summary

A low-cost sediment trap deployed in fluvial systems captured approximately 25% of introduced microplastics across varied particle types and flow rates, with capture efficiency varying significantly by particle size and shape. The results provide a baseline for designing affordable, scalable tools to monitor and potentially remediate microplastic pollution in rivers and creeks.

Study Type Environmental

Uncovering complex microplastic interactions in fluvial systems is critical for taking action to remediate these environmental pollutants. A low-cost sediment trap has been developed for deployment in shallow creeks and rivers to capture microplastics. To test the trapping efficiency of this design, a flume was constructed to move plastics of different chemical compositions, shapes, and diameters through the trap. The sediment trap was tested in experiments, with (1) a high discharge rate (2.30 m 3 /hour) and (2) a low discharge rate (1.15 m 3 /hour). A total of eight hundred microplastic particles, one hundred particles of eight different types of fibers, fragments, nurdles, and foam spheres, were introduced in the flume for each experiment. Each experiment trapped approximately one-quarter of the plastics introduced in the sediment trap (high discharge = 25.13%; low discharge = 21.75%). The high discharge rate experiment proved to be most effective in trapping small diameter (1-2 mm) foam spheres (69%), while being less effective at trapping large ( >4 mm) foam balls (4%). The low discharge rate experiment proved to be the most effective at trapping thin (0.2 mm-diameter, 3-cm long) fishing line (43%), and, similar to the higher discharge experiment, least effective in trapping the large foam balls (3%). The results of these experiments aid in understanding the trap’s microplastic capture efficiency across different sizes of microplastic traveling at varying rates. Future work will include measurement of microplastics captured by deposition from overlying flow into the trap and will consider the role of sediment in this system.

Share this paper