We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Identification and quantitation of semi-crystalline microplastics using image analysis and differential scanning calorimetry
Summary
Researchers developed an analytical workflow combining optical microscopy with image analysis and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) for identifying and quantifying semi-crystalline microplastics including LDPE, HDPE, PP, and PET. The study found that particle size significantly affects DSC signal quality, requiring sieve pre-treatment to achieve reliable identification and mass quantitation.
There are several techniques used to analyze microplastics. These are often based on a combination of visual and spectroscopic techniques. Here we introduce an alternative workflow for identification and mass quantitation through a combination of optical microscopy with image analysis (IA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). We studied four synthetic polymers with environmental concern: low and high density polyethylene (LDPE and HDPE, respectively), polypropylene (PP), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Selected experiments were conducted to investigate (i) particle characterization and counting procedures based on image analysis with open-source software, (ii) chemical identification of microplastics based on DSC signal processing, (iii) dependence of particle size on DSC signal, and (iv) quantitation of microplastics mass based on DSC signal. We describe the potential and limitations of these techniques to increase reliability for microplastic analysis. Particle size demonstrated to have particular incidence in the qualitative and quantitative performance of DSC signals. Both, identification (based on characteristic onset temperature) and mass quantitation (based on heat flow) showed to be affected by particle size. As a result, a proper sample treatment which includes sieving of suspended particles is particularly required for this analytical approach.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Fast and easy quantification of semi-crystalline microplastics in exemplary environmental matrices by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
This study demonstrated that differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) can quantify semi-crystalline microplastics (PE, PET, PP, PA6) in environmental matrices, with pre-heating steps improving detection accuracy and reducing interference from organic impurities.
A facile approach to microplastic identification and quantification using differential scanning calorimetry
Researchers developed a simpler differential scanning calorimetry method to identify and quantify six types of semi-crystalline microplastic polymers in water samples, offering a lower-cost alternative to μFTIR that also provides mass concentration data.
Modeling microplastic with polyethylene (PE) spherical particles: a differential scanning calorimetry approach for quantification
Researchers developed a thermal analysis approach to detect and quantify polyethylene microplastics in environmental samples, offering an alternative to optical methods. Accurate quantification tools are essential for understanding the true scale of microplastic contamination in soil and water.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC): An important tool for polymer identification and characterization of plastic marine debris
Researchers optimized a differential scanning calorimetry method for identifying plastic polymers in marine debris and built a reference library from over 200 polymer standards. They established temperature-based criteria for distinguishing between similar plastic types that are often confused during visual identification. The study provides a practical, reliable tool for improving the accuracy of polymer identification in plastic pollution research.
Identification and Quantification of Microplastics in Effluents of Wastewater Treatment Plant by Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
Researchers used differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to identify and quantify microplastics including polyethylene, polystyrene, polypropylene, and PET in effluents from three wastewater treatment plants. Plants with only preliminary treatment removed less than 58% of microplastics, while those with secondary activated sludge treatment achieved 90 to 96.9% removal efficiency.