We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics Affect Energy Balance and Gametogenesis in the Pearl Oyster Pinctada margaritifera
AI summary Read the abstract
Pearl oysters exposed to microplastics showed disrupted energy metabolism and impaired gametogenesis, suggesting that plastic pollution could threaten the reproductive success of marine bivalves used in pearl farming. The findings have economic as well as ecological implications, given that pearl farming is a major industry in tropical Pacific island nations.
Plastic pollution in the environment is increasing at global scale. Microplastics (MP) are derived from degradation of larger plastic items or directly produced in microparticles form (< 5 mm). Plastics, widely used in structures and equipment of pearl farming, are a source of pollution to the detriment of the lagoon ecosystem. To evaluate the impact of MP on the physiology of Pinctada margaritifera, a species of ecological and commercial interests, adult oysters were exposed to polystyrene microbeads (micro-PS of 6 and 10 μm) for 2 months. Three concentrations, 0.25, 2.5, and 25 μg L-1, and a control were tested. Ingestion and respiration rate and assimilation efficiency were monitored on a metabolic measurement system to determine the individual energy balance (Scope For Growth, SFG). Effects on reproduction were also assessed. The assimilation efficiency decreased significantly according to micro-PS concentration. The SFG was significantly impacted by a dose-dependent decrease from 0.25 μg L-1 ( p < 0.0001), and a negative SFG was measured in oysters exposed to 25 μg L-1. Gonads may have provided the missing energy to maintain animals' metabolism through the production of metabolites derived from germ cells phagocytosis. This study shows that micro-PS significantly impact the assimilation efficiency and more broadly the energy balance of P. margaritifera, with negative repercussions on reproduction.
More Papers Like This
Pearl Farming Micro-nanoplastics Affect Oyster Physiology and Pearl Quality
AI summary Read the abstract
Pearl oysters (Pinctada margaritifera) exposed to micro-nanoplastics shed from plastic pearl farming equipment showed disrupted energy metabolism, reduced assimilation of microalgae food, and impaired pearl quality over a five-month production cycle. The study is notable because it tested environmentally realistic plastic concentrations, linking the industry's own plastic infrastructure to measurable biological harm in the farmed animals.
Pearl farming micro-nanoplastics affect both oyster physiology and pearl quality
AI summary Read the abstract
Pearl oysters (Pinctada margaritifera) in French Polynesia were exposed to micro-nanoplastics derived from actual farming equipment over a five-month production cycle, and the plastics disrupted the oysters' energy metabolism and altered the crystal structure of growing pearls. The study demonstrates that microplastic contamination in lagoons poses a real economic threat to the pearl industry alongside its ecological impacts.
Pearl farming micro-nanoplastics affect both oyster physiology and pearl quality
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed pearl oysters in French Polynesian lagoons to micro- and nanoplastics shed from pearl farming equipment itself, and found that even environmentally realistic concentrations disrupted energy metabolism and reduced how efficiently the oysters absorbed food from algae. After five months of exposure, both oyster health markers and pearl quality were measurably degraded. This shows that plastic pollution in aquaculture settings can undermine the very industry it contaminates, linking environmental and economic harm.
Pearl farming micro-nanoplastics affect both oyster physiology and pearl quality
AI summary Read the abstract
Microplastics shed from pearl farming equipment accumulate in lagoon waters and, even at low concentrations, disrupt the energy metabolism, immune function, and reproductive biology of pearl oysters over a 5-month production cycle. Pearl quality was measurably degraded, meaning plastic pollution from aquaculture gear creates a feedback loop that harms the very industry generating it. This highlights a practical economic incentive — beyond ecological concern — for reducing plastic use in mariculture.
Microplastics impact shell and pearl biomineralization of the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found microplastics embedded within the shells and pearls of the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata for the first time, demonstrating that microplastic pollution can interfere with biomineralization processes in commercially important marine bivalves.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.