0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Phytoplankton response to polystyrene microplastics: Perspective from an entire growth period

Chemosphere 2018 669 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yufeng Mao Yufeng Mao Yufeng Mao Hong Li, Yufeng Mao Hong Li, Qiang He, Hong Li, Hong Li, Hong Li, Qiang He, Qiang He, Wei Li, Wei Li, Hainan Ai, Hong Li, Weikang Gu, Weikang Gu, Wei Li, Yi Chen, Yi Chen, Hong Li, Qiang He, Wei Li, Yufeng Mao Yufeng Mao Yi Chen, Hong Li, Zhen‐Yu Zhang, Hong Li, Zhen‐Yu Zhang, Hong Li, Hong Li, Hong Li, Wei Li, Hong Li, Yufeng Mao Yi Chen, Yi Chen, Wei Li, Qiang He, Qiang He, Peng Zeng, Yufeng Mao Li Kang, Yi Chen, Yi Chen, Qiang He, Qiang He, Wei Li, Hong Li, Hong Li, Hong Li, Wei Li, Yi Chen, Yi Chen, Yi Chen, Hong Li, Weikang Gu, Weikang Gu, Qiang He, Yi Chen, Qiang He, Yi Chen, Hong Li, Yufeng Mao Yufeng Mao

Summary

Researchers tracked the effects of polystyrene microplastics on the green alga Chlorella pyrenoidosa across its entire growth cycle and found dose-dependent harm during early growth phases. The microplastics reduced photosynthetic activity and inhibited growth by up to 38%, though the algae showed some ability to recover in later growth stages. The study suggests that microplastics can meaningfully disrupt the growth of freshwater phytoplankton, which form the foundation of aquatic food webs.

Polymers

Microplastics are widely identified in aquatic environments, but their impacts on phytoplankton have not been extensively studied. Here, the responses of Chlorella pyrenoidosa under polystyrene (PS) microplastics exposure were studied across its whole growth period, with microplastic sizes of 0.1 and 1.0 μm and 3 concentration gradients each, which covered (10 and 50 mg/L) and exceeded (100 mg/L) its environmental concentrations, respectively. PS microplastics caused dose-dependent adverse effects on Chlorella pyrenoidosa growth from the lag to the earlier logarithmic phases, but exhibited slight difference in the maximal inhibition ratio (approximately 38%) with respect to the two microplastic sizes. In addition to the reduced photosynthetic activity of Chlorella pyrenoidosa, unclear pyrenoids, distorted thylakoids and damaged cell membrane were observed, attributing to the physical damage and oxidative stress caused by microplastics. However, from the end of the logarithmic to the stationary phase, Chlorella pyrenoidosa could reduce the adverse effects of microplastics jointly through cell wall thickening, algae homo-aggregation and algae-microplastics hetero-aggregation, hence triggering an increase of algal photosynthetic activity and its growth, and cell structures turned to normal. Our study confirmed that PS microplastics can impair but then enhance algae growth, which will be helpful in understanding the ecological risks of microplastics.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper