We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Guidance on risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain: Part 1, human and animal health
AI summary Read the abstract
The European Food Safety Authority published updated guidance on risk assessment of nanoscience and nanotechnology applications in food and feed, covering novel foods, food contact materials, and additives. The guidance addresses characterization of nanomaterials, exposure assessment, and hazard identification, providing a framework relevant to understanding how nano-scale plastic particles in the food chain should be evaluated for safety.
The European Food Safety Authority has produced this Guidance on human and animal health aspects (Part 1) of the risk assessment of nanoscience and nanotechnology applications in the food and feed chain. It covers the application areas within EFSA's remit, e.g. novel foods, food contact materials, food/feed additives and pesticides. The Guidance takes account of the new developments that have taken place since publication of the previous Guidance in 2011. Potential future developments are suggested in the scientific literature for nanoencapsulated delivery systems and nanocomposites in applications such as novel foods, food/feed additives, biocides, pesticides and food contact materials. Therefore, the Guidance has taken account of relevant new scientific studies that provide more insights to physicochemical properties, exposure assessment and hazard characterisation of nanomaterials. It specifically elaborates on physicochemical characterisation of nanomaterials in terms of how to establish whether a material is a nanomaterial, the key parameters that should be measured, the methods and techniques that can be used for characterisation of nanomaterials and their determination in complex matrices. It also details the aspects relating to exposure assessment and hazard identification and characterisation. In particular, nanospecific considerations relating to in vivo/in vitro toxicological studies are discussed and a tiered framework for toxicological testing is outlined. It describes in vitro degradation, toxicokinetics, genotoxicity as well as general issues relating to testing of nanomaterials. Depending on the initial tier results, studies may be needed to investigate reproductive and developmental toxicity, immunotoxicity, allergenicity, neurotoxicity, effects on gut microbiome and endocrine activity. The possible use of read-across to fill data gaps as well as the potential use of integrated testing strategies and the knowledge of modes/mechanisms of action are also discussed. The Guidance proposes approaches to risk characterisation and uncertainty analysis, and provides recommendations for further research in this area.
More Papers Like This
Potential health risks of nanomaterials in food: a methodology to identify signals and prioritise risks
AI summary Read the abstract
This Dutch report assessed the potential health risks of nanomaterials in food, evaluating existing methods for detecting and evaluating the safety of engineered nanoparticles. As nanoplastics increasingly enter the food supply through packaging and environmental contamination, frameworks for their risk assessment become critical.
Towards a risk assessment framework for micro- and nanoplastic particles for human health
AI summary Read the abstract
This review proposes a framework for assessing the health risks of micro- and nanoplastics to humans, noting that current methods are inadequate because these particles come in countless types, sizes, and chemical compositions. The authors recommend focusing first on inhalation risks and suggest using existing approaches for evaluating low-toxicity particles and fibers as a starting point for plastic particle safety standards.
Regulatory Science Perspective on the Analysis of Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Human Food
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper from a regulatory science perspective highlights that current methods for detecting and measuring microplastics and nanoplastics in food are not yet reliable enough for formal food safety assessments. There is a lack of standardized definitions, reference materials, and validated analytical methods, especially for nanoplastics. Until these gaps are addressed, it will be difficult for food safety agencies to accurately determine how much plastic contamination people are consuming and whether it poses a health risk.
Presence of microplastics and nanoplastics in food, with particular focus on seafood
AI summary Read the abstract
This assessment by the European Food Safety Authority reviews what is known about microplastics and nanoplastics in food, with a focus on seafood. Researchers found that while microplastics are present in many commercially important fish and shellfish species, most particles concentrate in the gut, which is typically removed before consumption. The study notes that nanoplastics remain poorly understood and highlights the need for better detection methods and exposure data to evaluate potential risks to human health.
Microplastics as Emerging Food Contaminants: A Challenge for Food Safety
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines microplastics as an emerging contaminant in the food supply, covering how they enter the food chain, their characteristics, and the challenges of assessing their health risks. Researchers found that while microplastics have been detected in a wide range of food products, current scientific data is insufficient to complete a thorough risk assessment of dietary exposure. The study calls for standardized detection methods and more research to establish safe exposure thresholds for microplastics in food.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.