0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Nanoplastics Sign in to save

From stress to defense: Spatial confinement of nanoplastics in rice root cell walls via pectin matrix remodeling

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Chaofa Chen, Jiaji Liu, Chenghua Xing, Xi‐Lin Wu, Engao Zhu, Yuchun Rao, Yan Lin, Jianfang Yan, Miaozhen Cai, Miaozhen Cai, Hua Zhang, Yongming Luo

Summary

Researchers showed that rice roots defend against nanoplastic intrusion by rapidly increasing pectin content in cell walls by 65%, which traps nearly half the nanoplastics within root tissue and stiffens cell walls to suppress upward transport to edible shoots.

Nanoplastics (NPs), ubiquitous environmental pollutants, are increasingly documented to accumulate in plants and induce phytotoxicity. However, the mechanisms governing their cellular-level interactions with plants, particularly root cell wall adaptations to limit translocation, remain unresolved. Here, we elucidate how rice (Oryza sativa L.) root cell walls employ pectin-mediated remodeling to immobilize europium-doped polystyrene NPs (PS-Eu NPs) under hydroponic conditions. Exposure to 50 mg/L PS-Eu NPs for 14 days resulted in 96.94 % retention in roots and only 3.06 % translocation to shoots. Remarkably, root pectin content surged by 64.7 %, directly enhancing NP entrapment (43.9 % of total PS-Eu NPs bound to pectin). This pectin-driven response induced structural reorganization of the cell wall, characterized by increased thickness, stiffness, and adhesiveness, which collectively immobilized 51.47 % of NPs within root cell walls and suppressed upward transport. Multi-omics analyses further uncovered coordinated upregulation of pectin biosynthesis genes (e.g., galacturonosyltransferases, 26-80 %) and modification enzymes (e.g., pectin methylesterases, 12-63 %), accompanied by elevated polysaccharide metabolic intermediates. These findings establish that pectin-dominated cell wall fortification is a critical plant defense strategy to mitigate NP stress, providing mechanistic insights into cellular barriers against nanoparticle translocation in agroecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Polystyrene nanoplastics induce cell type-dependent secondary wall reinforcement in rice (Oryza sativa) roots and reduce root hydraulic conductivity

Researchers found that polystyrene nanoplastics penetrating rice roots trigger a cell-type-specific defense response in which the plant reinforces its secondary cell walls with lignin and suberin in key barrier tissues, increasing wall thickness by up to 22% while simultaneously reducing the root's ability to absorb water by nearly 15%.

Article Tier 2

When Nano- and Microplastics Meet Taro (Colocasia esculenta) Roots: Their Size-Dependent Adsorption, Penetration, and Promotion on Secondary Wall Reinforcement

Researchers exposed taro plants to different sizes of plastic particles and found that nanoplastics (50-100 nm) could penetrate root cells while larger microplastics (200-500 nm) could not. In response, the taro roots mounted a defense by thickening their cell walls by over 100%, successfully preventing the plastics from reaching the edible corm, which suggests some food crops may have natural defenses against plastic contamination in soil.

Article Tier 2

Charge-selective polystyrene nanoplastic retention by plant cell walls: Pectin domains dictate differential accumulation in rice seedling roots and shoots

A study of rice seedling roots found that plant cell walls act as a charge-selective barrier to nanoplastics: negatively charged polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-COOH) accumulated nearly 4.5 times more in shoots than positively charged ones (PS-NH₂), while positive nanoplastics were preferentially retained in root cell walls by binding to pectin. The results are directly relevant to food safety because they show that nanoplastic surface chemistry determines how much plastic penetrates into the edible parts of a major global food crop.

Article Tier 2

Root Meristem Maintenance Mechanisms are Key to Plant Defense Against Nanoplastics

Researchers discovered that the smallest nanoplastics (20 nanometers) dramatically inhibit root growth in plants, while larger particles have minimal effects. The tiny plastics damage root meristem cells and block cell division, prompting plants to activate defense mechanisms that redirect the growth hormone auxin to protect their roots. However, this defensive response comes at a cost, impairing the plant's ability to sense gravity, which is essential for adapting to its environment.

Article Tier 2

Oryza rufipogon and nanoparticles mitigate nanoplastic toxicity by modulating lignin, cell wall thickening, and carbohydrate metabolism

Researchers compared wild rice (Oryza rufipogon) and cultivated rice under nanoplastic stress, finding that wild rice suffered far less growth and chlorophyll loss due to greater lignin deposition, stronger antioxidant defenses, and activation of cell wall-strengthening genes, while adding nano-selenium partially restored growth in both varieties.

Share this paper