0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

When Nano- and Microplastics Meet Taro (<i>Colocasia esculenta</i>) Roots: Their Size-Dependent Adsorption, Penetration, and Promotion on Secondary Wall Reinforcement

Environmental Science & Technology 2025 16 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 68 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Jingjing Yin, Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Jingjing Yin, Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Tongshan Zhu, Fayuan Wang Tongshan Zhu, Fayuan Wang Guoxin Xu, Tongshan Zhu, Fayuan Wang Tongshan Zhu, Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Xiaozun Li, Xiaozun Li, Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Tongshan Zhu, Tongshan Zhu, Xiaozun Li, Xiaozun Li, Fayuan Wang Tongshan Zhu, Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Xiaozun Li, Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Xiaozun Li, Xiaozun Li, Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Xiaozun Li, Tongshan Zhu, Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Jingjing Yin, Xiaozun Li, Guoxin Xu, Xiaozun Li, Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Guoxin Xu, Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang Fayuan Wang

Summary

Researchers exposed taro plants to different sizes of plastic particles and found that nanoplastics (50-100 nm) could penetrate root cells while larger microplastics (200-500 nm) could not. In response, the taro roots mounted a defense by thickening their cell walls by over 100%, successfully preventing the plastics from reaching the edible corm, which suggests some food crops may have natural defenses against plastic contamination in soil.

Nano/microplastics (N/MPs) induce phytotoxicity and represent a significant global threat to terrestrial and agricultural ecosystems. However, the defense mechanisms of plants against different-sized N/MPs remain largely unknown. To address this knowledge gap, we investigated the interactions between polystyrene (PS) NPs (50 and 100 nm) and PS-MPs (200 and 500 nm) with taro (<i>Colocasia esculenta</i>). We found that PS particles of varying sizes exhibited differential root adsorption and penetration, with PS-NPs capable of penetrating the root epidermis, whereas PS-MPs were totally excluded. Notably, taro demonstrated the capacity to recognize different sizes of N/MPs and responded with varying degrees of resistance. In reaction to the more toxic and penetrating 50 nm PS-NPs, the roots mobilized a robust defense mechanism with three levels: molecular, compositional, and ultrastructural. This defense was achieved by activating lignin synthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and lipid transport, resulting in a doubling of the lignified region of the root and increases in cell wall thickness of 116%, 56.3%, and 22.5% in the epidermis, exodermis, and cortex, respectively. Consequently, roots excluded all four sizes of N/MPs outside the vascular tissue and prevented the contamination of the corms. Our study provides new insights into the interaction mechanisms of N/MPs with plants and demonstrates the crucial role of root barriers in sustaining food safety.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper