0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Remediation Sign in to save

The role of biodegradable plastic mulches in soil organic carbon cycling

2019 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Marie English

Summary

This review examines the role of biodegradable plastic mulches in soil organic carbon cycling as an alternative to conventional polyethylene mulches, which shed microplastics into agricultural soils. Biodegradable mulches offer potential environmental benefits but their long-term soil impacts are still being studied.

Polymers

Agricultural plastic mulching improves weed management and controls the soil moisture and temperature leading to large increases in yield. Unfortunately, the rise in popularity of mulching results in more plastic pollution due to a lack of recycling options for polyethylene (PE) mulch. Biodegradable plastic mulches (BDMs) are an alternative to the traditionally used PE mulches and are recommended for tillage into the soil at the end of the season. There is evidence that by altering soil moisture and temperature, the use of mulching is tightly tied to soil carbon (C) cycling. The purpose of this study was to gain insight on the effect of BDMs on soil C storage, an important part of soil health, using field and lab studies. The field study was replicated in two diverse climates, Knoxville, TN and Mt.Vernon, WA. Multiple C pools were measured over two years (Spring 2015- Spring 2017) to monitor the effect of 7 different mulching treatments (four BDMs and three controls: PE plastic mulch, cellulosic (paper) mulch, and no-mulch). After two years, results were variable across locations, but PE treatments accumulated less soil C than the no-mulch control in each location. These differences are likely due to increased mineralization from the higher soil moistures and temperatures in the PE treatment compared to the no-mulch treatment. The use and incorporation of BDMs showed no significant declines in soil C pools compared to the no-mulch control. Season and location significantly affected C pools as well. To improve estimates of BDM fate, BDM microplastics were measured from field samples using a novel method. The second part of this study was a lab experiment to investigate how air temperature affects the biodegradation of BDMs by combining time course biodegradation measures with soil C pools, soil microbial properties, and chemical properties of the BDMs. Collectively, these results showed significantly higher BDM biodegradation at higher temperatures with amorphous polymeric regions being degraded first. The positive effects of BDMs on soil C stocks compared to PE supports their use as a substitute to PE; however more research is needed on microplastic residence times.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Biodegradable Plastic Mulch Films: Impacts on Soil Microbial Communities and Ecosystem Functions

This review examines how biodegradable plastic mulch films affect soil microbial communities and ecosystem functions compared to conventional polyethylene mulches. Researchers found that while biodegradable films avoid the problem of permanent plastic accumulation, their breakdown products can still alter soil microbiomes and carbon cycling in ways that are not yet fully understood. The study highlights the need for long-term field research to determine whether biodegradable mulches are truly a sustainable alternative for agriculture.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics from conventional and biodegradable mulch films alter microbial necromass accumulation and organic carbon sequestration in farmland soils

Researchers compared how microplastics from conventional polyethylene and biodegradable mulch films affect soil organic carbon storage over 120 days. They found that both types of microplastics altered microbial activity and reduced the accumulation of microbial-derived carbon in soil. The study suggests that even biodegradable plastics, once broken into microplastics, may interfere with soil carbon sequestration in farmland.

Clinical Trial Tier 1

Biodegradable Film Mulching Increases Soil Carbon Sequestration and Microbial Network Complexity in a Long-Term Field Study

Scientists studied biodegradable plastic mulch (the plastic sheeting farmers use to cover soil) and found it helps soil store more carbon and support healthier microbial communities compared to regular plastic mulch. However, the biodegradable plastic still breaks down into microplastics in the soil, raising questions about long-term environmental effects. This matters because while biodegradable farm plastics may help fight climate change by storing carbon, we still need to understand how the microplastics they leave behind might affect our food system.

Article Tier 2

Possible hazards from biodegradation of soil plastic mulch: Increases in microplastics and CO2 emissions

Researchers conducted an 18-month experiment to study whether biodegradable plastic mulches actually break down fully in soil or leave behind microplastic fragments. They found that the biodegradable mulches did generate microplastics and also increased soil carbon dioxide emissions compared to conventional mulch. The study raises questions about whether biodegradable mulches are truly more environmentally friendly than standard plastic film when microplastic generation and carbon release are considered.

Article Tier 2

Effect of different polymers of microplastics on soil organic carbon and nitrogen – A mesocosm experiment

Researchers found that adding polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics to agricultural soil altered carbon and nitrogen dynamics, with biodegradable microplastics having stronger effects on soil organic carbon decomposition and nutrient cycling than conventional plastics.

Share this paper