0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Degradation of Polyethylene and Biocomponent-Derived Polymer Materials: An Overview

Journal of Polymers and the Environment 2019 106 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Monika Mierzwa–Hersztek, Krzysztof Gondek, Michał Kopeć

Summary

This review examines the degradation of synthetic polyethylene and bio-based polymer materials, noting that conventional plastics can persist in the environment for hundreds of years while bio-based 'bioplastics' are frequently misunderstood as fully biodegradable. Researchers found that strategies such as incorporating pro-degradant additives or shifting to true biodegradable polymers are critical for reducing long-term environmental persistence.

Polymers

The progressing degradation of the natural environment taking place over the last few decades and resulting from the systematically growing production of synthetic polymer materials led to the search for technological innovations aimed at producing environmentally friendly materials. Moreover, the increasing importance of sustainability promotes the development of bio-based and biodegradable polymers, sometimes misleadingly referred to as “bioplastics”. Inability to degrade synthetic polymer materials and the problem of their persistence in the environment even for hundreds of years have caused the production of polymer materials with the addition of components that may accelerate their degradation more and more important in recent years. Additionally, the growing interest in environmental issues makes the requirements for new materials that will not significantly burden the environment higher. In Poland 29.1% and 26.8% of post-consumer polymer materials, respectively, were recovered and recycled, which means that up to 44.1% of post-consumer polymer materials were sent to municipal landfills. In 2017, for the first time in Poland, more plastics were recovered (55.9%) than stored (44.1%). However, by 2020, the level of energy recovery and recycling of post-consumer polymer materials in Poland should cover a total of 84.5%. When looking at the average values for Europe (recycling 31.1%, recovery 41.6%, storage 27.3%), it should be noted that Poland has much to catch up in this area and decisive actions should be taken to actually solve this problem. For this reason, it is extremely important to know the mechanisms responsible for the degradation of polymer materials and understand the interaction between these materials and abiotic and biotic factors that cause structural changes in polymers. Recent studies show that knowledge of the conditions determining the decomposition of polyethylene polymer materials and their impact on the natural environment is still insufficient. The literature reports reveal many contradictory theories, especially those that relate to the degradation of polymer materials in the soil environment. This study constitutes a comprehensive review of researches on (bio)degradation of polymer materials over the last decades, various methods of polymer structure modification to increase the degree of their degradability, as well as methods of recycling post-consumer polymer materials. Because there is a need to assess the performance of polymer innovations in terms of their biodegradability, especially under realistic waste management and environmental conditions, to avoid the unwanted release of plastic degradation products to the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Biodegradability of Plastics: Challenges and Misconceptions

This review addresses widespread misconceptions about plastic biodegradability, explaining why most plastics persist in the environment for decades to centuries despite industry marketing claims. It clarifies the distinction between degradable, biodegradable, and compostable plastics and explains why real-world conditions rarely support plastic breakdown.

Article Tier 2

Review on the Biological Degradation of Polymers in Various Environments

This review provides an overview of how biodegradable plastics degrade under different environmental conditions including soil, freshwater, marine, and composting environments. It finds that biodegradability is a material property strongly dependent on environmental conditions, and that many so-called biodegradable plastics degrade far more slowly in nature than in controlled test conditions.

Article Tier 2

Novel Approach in Biodegradation of Synthetic Thermoplastic Polymers: An Overview

This review examines microbial biodegradation pathways for synthetic thermoplastic polymers including polyethylene, highlighting the ecological threat of non-degradable plastics and discussing the mechanisms by which microorganisms can break down both natural and synthetic polymers.

Article Tier 2

Comparing environmental fate and ecotoxicity of conventional and biodegradable plastics: A critical review

This review compares biodegradable and conventional plastics and finds that biodegradable plastics do not always fully break down under natural conditions -- instead they often fragment into microplastics and release chemical additives, similar to conventional plastics. Both types can absorb pollutants from the environment and cause toxic effects in living organisms, challenging the assumption that biodegradable plastics are a safe alternative.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence, Degradation, and Effect of Polymer-Based Materials in the Environment

This review covers the occurrence, environmental degradation, and ecological effects of polymer-based materials across terrestrial and aquatic environments, including both conventional and biodegradable plastics. It highlights the chemical complexity of plastics — including additives and degradation products — as a key factor determining environmental risk beyond just the physical presence of particles.

Share this paper