0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Microplastics in Freshwater Biota: A Critical Review of Isolation, Characterization, and Assessment Methods

Global Challenges 2019 127 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical review examined methodological challenges in isolating, characterizing, and assessing microplastics in freshwater biota, identifying key gaps in standardization that limit comparability across studies and impede understanding of microplastic ingestion, translocation, and trophic transfer in freshwater ecosystems.

Study Type Environmental

Freshwater systems provide key pathways for microplastic (MP) pollution, and although existing studies have demonstrated the susceptibility of freshwater biota to ingestion, translocation, and trophic transfer, specific challenges pertaining to methodological standardization remain largely unresolved, particularly with respect to isolating, characterizing, and assessing MPs. Here, a critical review is performed outlining the challenges and limitations currently faced by freshwater MP researchers, which may well apply across the MP research spectrum. Recommendations are provided for methodological standardization, particularly in MP characterization, quality assurance, and quality control (QA/QC) procedures as well as reporting. Considerations for the assessment of MPs in freshwater biota as a means of improving comparisons between studies are discussed. Technological advancements, including the improvement of laboratory infrastructure for identifying MPs within the smaller size range as well as methodological standardization are essential in providing policy makers with tools and measures necessary to determine the distribution of MPs within freshwater ecosystems, while also allowing for comparability and providing compliance for future monitoring requirements.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Quality Criteria for the Analysis of Microplastic in Biota Samples: A Critical Review

AI summary Read the abstract

Ten quality criteria were applied to review recent microplastic ingestion studies in aquatic biota, finding wide variation in methodological rigor including inadequate sample sizes, poor contamination controls, and inconsistent polymer identification methods. The authors propose a standardized quality assessment framework to improve comparability of microplastic ingestion data across studies.

Article Tier 2

A critical view on microplastic quantification in aquatic organisms

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers critically reviewed the methods used to quantify microplastics in aquatic organisms including zooplankton, bivalves, and fish. The study highlights that no standardized methodology exists for measuring microplastic contamination in biota, which makes comparing results across studies difficult and underscores the need for consistent analytical protocols.

Article Tier 2

Sampling, Isolating and Identifying Microplastics Ingested by Fish and Invertebrates *

AI summary Read the abstract

This methodological review critically evaluated sampling, isolation, and identification techniques for microplastics ingested by fish and invertebrates, identifying common sources of error including contamination during processing, particle loss, and misidentification — and recommending standardized protocols.

Article Tier 2

Recent advances in the analysis methodologies for microplastics in aquatic organisms: current knowledge and research challenges

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines recent advances in analytical methods for detecting and quantifying microplastics in aquatic organisms, identifying key sources of variability across studies and outlining research challenges needed to improve comparability and standardization.

Article Tier 2

A critical review of microplastics characterisation in aquatic environments: recent trends in the last 10 years

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical review assessed current approaches to characterizing microplastics in aquatic environments, evaluating sampling methods, extraction protocols, and analytical techniques. It identified persistent inconsistencies in methodology and recommended standardization practices to improve data comparability.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper