0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

The Environmental Risks Associated With the Development of Seaweed Farming in Europe - Prioritizing Key Knowledge Gaps

Frontiers in Marine Science 2019 298 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Iona Campbell, Adrian Macleod, Christian Sahlmann, Luiza Neves, Jon Funderud, Margareth Øverland, Adam D. Hughes, Michele S. Stanley

Summary

This systematic review of environmental risks from European seaweed farming identified disease facilitation, population genetic alterations, and changes to the local physiochemical environment as the highest-priority concerns. While current small-scale operations are considered low risk, expanding to large-scale cultivation will require better understanding of scale-dependent environmental changes.

Study Type Review

Cultivation of kelp has been well established throughout Asia, and there is now growing interest in the cultivation of macroalgae in Europe to meet future resource needs. If this industry is to become established throughout Europe, then balancing the associated environmental risks with potential benefits will be necessary to ensure the carrying capacity of the receiving environments are not exceeded and conservation objects are not undermined. This is a systematic review of the ecosystem changes likely to be associated with a developing seaweed aquaculture industry. Monitoring recommendations are made by risk ranking environmental changes, highlighting the current knowledge gaps and providing research priorities to address them. Environmental changes of greatest concern were identified to include: facilitation of disease, alteration of population genetics and wider alterations to the local physiochemical environment. Current high levels of uncertainty surrounding the true extent of some environmental changes mean conservative risk rankings are given. Recommended monitoring options are discussed that aim to address uncertainty and facilitate informed decision-making. Whilst current small-scale cultivation projects are considered ‘low risk’, an expansion of the industry that includes ‘large-scale’ cultivation will necessitate a more complete understanding of the scale dependent changes in order to balance environmental risks with the benefits that seaweed cultivation projects can offer.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

A baseline studies programme for sustainable and resilient seaweed cultivation in Faroese fjords

Researchers developed a baseline environmental studies programme for seaweed cultivation in Faroese fjords, scoping potential impacts on the marine environment and recommending a monitoring programme to support sustainable and resilient aquaculture development in the Faroe Islands.

Article Tier 2

Food safety hazards in the European seaweed chain

Researchers reviewed food safety hazards in the European seaweed supply chain, ranking 22 potential hazards based on available evidence. Arsenic, cadmium, iodine, and Salmonella were identified as major hazards, while micro- and nanoplastics were among the hazards where significant data gaps exist. The study recommends collecting more data on these under-researched hazards, noting that factors like seaweed type, cultivation location, and processing methods all influence contaminant levels.

Article Tier 2

The empirical evidence for the social-ecological impacts of seaweed farming

This systematic review assessed empirical evidence for social and ecological impacts of seaweed farming globally, finding that while benefits like improved water quality and coastal livelihoods are well-documented, many other claimed benefits lack strong empirical support.

Article Tier 2

Contribution of seaweed farming to the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and microplastics pollution

Researchers reviewed how seaweed farming can help fight two major environmental problems: seaweed absorbs CO2 from the atmosphere without competing for agricultural land, and seaweed-derived polymers can be used to make biodegradable plastics that break down without generating persistent microplastics. Scaling up seaweed-based bioplastics remains limited by production costs, but the potential environmental benefits make further research worthwhile.

Article Tier 2

Learning to discuss safety within the European seaweed aquaculture sector

This paper is not about microplastics. It introduces a generic safety assessment protocol for the European seaweed aquaculture sector, covering food safety, environmental safety, and occupational health. While seaweed farming occurs in marine environments where microplastics are present, the study focuses on developing safety frameworks for the aquaculture industry rather than addressing microplastic contamination.

Share this paper